arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.04541cs.CR
收藏

GDPR与公有区块链系统之间张力的系统文献综述

A Systematic Literature Review of the Tension between the GDPR and Public Blockchain Systems

Rahime Belen-Saglam, Enes Altuncu, Yang Lu, Shujun Li

AI总结:

本文对114篇论文进行系统文献综述,揭示公有区块链与GDPR之间的三大张力(数据主体权利、角色识别、法律适用模糊性),并提出合规改进方向。

摘要:

自2008年比特币问世以来,区块链技术迅速发展。最常见的区块链系统类型——公有(无许可)区块链系统,具有一些独特特征,这些特征导致其与欧盟《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)及其他类似数据保护法律之间产生张力。本文报告了一项系统文献综述(SLR)的结果,该综述涵盖了114篇讨论和/或解决此类张力的研究论文。据我们所知,我们的SLR是对该主题最全面的综述,对此重要主题的相关研究工作进行了更深入和更广泛的分析。我们的结果揭示了三大类问题:(i)由于公有区块链的不可变性,数据主体行使权利(如“被遗忘权”(RTBF))存在困难;(ii)在公有区块链数据处理生态系统中,识别角色和责任存在困难(尤其是在识别数据控制者和数据处理者方面);(iii)由于区块链的分布式特性,相关法律的适用存在模糊性。我们的工作还促进了对提高公有区块链系统GDPR合规性解决方案的更好理解。我们的工作不仅有助于告知区块链研究人员和开发者,还有助于政策制定者和立法者考虑如何调和公有区块链系统与数据保护法律(GDPR及其他法律)之间的张力。

英文摘要:

The blockchain technology has been rapidly growing since Bitcoin was invented in 2008. The most common type of blockchain systems, public (permisionless) blockchain systems have some unique features that lead to a tension with European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other similar data protection laws. In this paper, we report the results of a systematic literature review (SLR) on 114 research papers discussing and/or addressing such a tension. To be the best of our know, our SLR is the most comprehensive review of this topic, leading a more in-depth and broader analysis of related research work on this important topic. Our results revealed that three main types of issues: (i) difficulties in exercising data subjects' rights such as the `right to be forgotten' (RTBF) due to the immutable nature of public blockchains; (ii) difficulties in identifying roles and responsibilities in the public blockchain data processing ecosystem (particularly on the identification of data controllers and data processors); (iii) ambiguities regarding the application of the relevant law(s) due to the distributed nature of blockchains. Our work also led to a better understanding of solutions for improving the GDPR compliance of public blockchain systems. Our work can help inform not only blockchain researchers and developers, but also policy makers and law markers to consider how to reconcile the tension between public blockchain systems and data protection laws (the GDPR and beyond).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑