arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2209.04060gr-qcastro-ph.HE
收藏

未来星载探测器重力波形的优先事项:真空精度还是环境?

Priorities in gravitational waveforms for future space-borne detectors: vacuum accuracy or environment?

Lorenz Zwick, Pedro R. Capelo, Lucio Mayer

摘要:

在为未来的星载引力波探测器做准备时,建模工作应侧重于高精度真空模板还是源的天体物理环境?我们进行了系统的比较相位的贡献所造成的1)已知的环境效应在气体和恒星物质的背景下,或2)高阶后牛顿{(PN)}项的mHz GW源的演变{在大质量双星的inspiral阶段}。我们使用目前可用的分析波形模型的准确性作为基准{值,发现}以下趋势:最大的未建模的相位贡献可能是环境,而不是PN的二进制轻于$\sim 10^7/(1+z)^2$ ~M $_{\odot}$,其中$z$是红移。由于低信噪比(SNR),比$\sim 10^8/(1+z)$ ~M $_{\odot}$重的二进制不需要更精确的{螺旋}波形。对于高信噪比源,环境{相位贡献}在低红移是相关的,而高阶真空模板需要在$z > 4$。在这些研究结果的领导下,我们认为应该优先考虑波形模型中的环境影响,以最大限度地提高未来mHz探测器的科学产量。

英文摘要:

In preparation for future space-borne gravitational-wave (GW) detectors, should the modelling effort focus on high-precision vacuum templates or on the astrophysical environment of the sources? We perform a systematic comparison of the phase contributions caused by 1) known environmental effects in both gaseous and stellar matter backgrounds, or 2) high-order post-Newtonian {(PN)} terms in the evolution of mHz GW sources {during the inspiral stage of massive binaries}. We use the accuracy of currently available analytical waveform models as a benchmark {value, finding} the following trends: the largest unmodelled phase contributions are likely environmental rather than PN for binaries lighter than $\sim 10^7/(1+z)^2$~M$_{\odot}$, where $z$ is the redshift. Binaries heavier than $\sim 10^8/(1+z)$~M$_{\odot}$ do not require more accurate {inspiral} waveforms due to low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). For high-SNR sources, environmental {phase contributions} are relevant at low redshift, while high-order vacuum templates are required at $z > 4$. Led by these findings, we argue that including environmental effects in waveform models should be prioritised in order to maximize the science yield of future mHz detectors.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑