arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2207.08005eess.SYcs.CRcs.SY
收藏

探索控制执行跳过对虚假数据注入攻击的鲁棒性

Exploring The Resilience of Control Execution Skips against False Data Injection Attacks

Ipsita Koley, Sunandan Adhikary, Soumyajit Dey

AI总结:

本文研究如何通过控制执行跳过提升CPS对虚假数据注入攻击的鲁棒性,提出最优跳过模式合成方法,并在安全关键CPS基准上验证了攻击鲁棒性与控制性能之间的权衡。

摘要:

现代信息物理系统(CPSs)通常被设计为基于软件的网络化控制器实现,这类实现已被发现容易受到网络层和物理层攻击。大量研究工作提出了CPS专用的攻击检测方案以及面向攻击鲁棒性的控制器设计技术。然而,这些方案也会带来平台层面的额外开销。在这一背景下,近期一些工作利用控制执行中的跳过机制来增强CPS对虚假数据注入(FDI)攻击的鲁棒性。本文针对何时以及如何通过跳过控制执行来提升系统对FDI攻击的鲁棒性,同时维持控制性能要求,进行了分析性讨论。我们还提出了一种用于合成此类最优控制执行模式的方法。据我们所知,此前尚无工作对这种非周期控制执行在攻击鲁棒性与控制性能之间的权衡提供定量分析。最后,我们在多个安全关键的CPS基准上对所提方法进行了评估。

英文摘要:

Modern Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are often designed as networked, software-based controller implementations which have been found to be vulnerable to network-level and physical level attacks. A number of research works have proposed CPS-specific attack detection schemes as well as techniques for attack resilient controller design. However, such schemes also incur platform-level overheads. In this regard, some recent works have leveraged the use of skips in control execution to enhance the resilience of a CPS against false data injection (FDI) attacks. In this paper, we provide an analytical discussion on when and how skipping a control execution can improve the resilience of the system against FDI attacks while maintaining the control performance requirement. We also propose a methodology to synthesize such optimal control execution patterns. To the best of our knowledge, no previous work has provided any quantitative analysis about the trade-off between attack resilience and control performance for such aperiodic control execution. Finally, we evaluate the proposed method on several safety-critical CPS benchmarks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑