arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2206.04470physics.chem-phcs.NAmath.NAphysics.atom-phquant-ph
收藏

分子碰撞中振转跃迁率的有效计算方法

Efficient computational methods for rovibrational transition rates in molecular collisions

Taha Selim, Ad van der Avoird, Gerrit C. Groenenboom

摘要:

天体物理模拟的过程中,不是在当地的热平衡的环境需要的知识,在分子碰撞的振转跃迁的状态到状态的速率系数。这些速率系数可以从耦合通道(CC)量子散射计算,这是非常苛刻的,但是。在这里,我们提出了各种近似的,但更有效的方法的基础上的耦合态近似(CSA),忽略了非对角科里奥利耦合的散射哈密顿体固定坐标。特别是,我们研究了一种称为NNCC(最近邻科里奥利耦合)的方法[D。Yang,X. Hu,D. H. Zhang和D. Xie,J.Chem.Phys.148,084101(2018)],其包括一阶科里奥利耦合。NNCC方法比常见的CSA方法要求更高,但仍然比完全CC计算更有效,并且比CSA更准确。所有这一切都说明了显示状态到状态的横截面和速率系数的振转跃迁诱导CO $_2$与He原子碰撞。它还表明,进一步减少CPU的时间,几乎没有损失的准确性,可以通过结合NNCC方法与多通道扭曲波玻恩近似(MC-DWBA),我们在以前的文件中应用于全CC计算。

英文摘要:

Astrophysical modeling of processes in environments that are not in local thermal equilibrium requires the knowledge of state-to-state rate coefficients of rovibrational transitions in molecular collisions. These rate coefficients can be obtained from coupled-channel (CC) quantum scattering calculations which are very demanding, however. Here we present various approximate, but more efficient methods based on the coupled-states approximation (CSA) which neglects the off-diagonal Coriolis coupling in the scattering Hamiltonian in body-fixed coordinates. In particular, we investigated a method called NNCC (nearest-neighbor Coriolis coupling) [D. Yang, X. Hu, D. H. Zhang, and D. Xie, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 084101 (2018)] that includes Coriolis coupling to first order. The NNCC method is more demanding than the common CSA method, but still much more efficient than full CC calculations, and it is substantially more accurate than CSA. All of this is illustrated by showing state-to-state cross sections and rate coefficients of rovibrational transitions induced in CO$_2$ by collisions with He atoms. It is also shown that a further reduction of CPU time, practically without loss of accuracy, can be obtained by combining the NNCC method with the multi-channel distorted-wave Born approximation (MC-DWBA) that we applied in full CC calculations in a previous paper.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑