arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2205.03633cs.CV

Comparison Knowledge Translation for Generalizable Image Classification

Zhejiang University(浙江大学);Shanghai Institute for Advanced Study of Zhejiang University(浙江大学上海高等研究院);Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Research Institute of Frontier Technologies(阿里巴巴-浙江大学前沿技术联合研究院);Hangzhou Honghua Digital Technology Co., Ltd.(杭州宏华数码科技股份有限公司);Ningbo Research Institute, Zhejiang University(浙江大学宁波研究院)

Zunlei Feng, Tian Qiu, Sai Wu, Xiaotuan Jin, Zengliang He, Mingli Song, Huiqiong Wang

英文摘要:

Deep learning has recently achieved remarkable performance in image classification tasks, which depends heavily on massive annotation. However, the classification mechanism of existing deep learning models seems to contrast to humans' recognition mechanism. With only a glance at an image of the object even unknown type, humans can quickly and precisely find other same category objects from massive images, which benefits from daily recognition of various objects. In this paper, we attempt to build a generalizable framework that emulates the humans' recognition mechanism in the image classification task, hoping to improve the classification performance on unseen categories with the support of annotations of other categories. Specifically, we investigate a new task termed Comparison Knowledge Translation (CKT). Given a set of fully labeled categories, CKT aims to translate the comparison knowledge learned from the labeled categories to a set of novel categories. To this end, we put forward a Comparison Classification Translation Network (CCT-Net), which comprises a comparison classifier and a matching discriminator. The comparison classifier is devised to classify whether two images belong to the same category or not, while the matching discriminator works together in an adversarial manner to ensure whether classified results match the truth. Exhaustive experiments show that CCT-Net achieves surprising generalization ability on unseen categories and SOTA performance on target categories.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑