arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2204.04440cs.LG
收藏

两个头是一样的吗?公平神经网络中的差异处理识别

Are Two Heads the Same as One? Identifying Disparate Treatment in Fair Neural Networks

University of Tübingen(图宾根大学);Amazon Web Services(亚马逊云科技);Fiddler AI(Fiddler人工智能公司)

Michael Lohaus, Matthäus Kleindessner, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Francesco Locatello, Chris Russell

摘要:

我们发现,经过训练以满足人口统计学平等的深度网络通常是通过某种形式的种族或性别意识来实现的,我们越是迫使网络公平,我们就越能准确地从网络的内部状态中恢复种族或性别。基于这一观察,我们研究了另一种公平方法:我们向网络添加第二个分类头,以显式预测原始任务旁边的受保护属性(如种族或性别)。在训练了双头网络之后,我们通过合并两个头来加强人口统计学上的均等,创建一个与原始网络具有相同架构的网络。我们建立了现有的方法和我们的方法之间的密切关系,通过显示(1)公平分类器的决定是很好的近似我们的方法,(2)一个不公平的和最佳准确的分类器可以从一个公平的分类器和我们的第二个头预测的保护属性。我们使用我们明确的表述来论证现有的公平方法,就像我们的方法一样,表现出不同的待遇,并且根据美国法律,它们在广泛的情况下可能是非法的。

英文摘要:

We show that deep networks trained to satisfy demographic parity often do so through a form of race or gender awareness, and that the more we force a network to be fair, the more accurately we can recover race or gender from the internal state of the network. Based on this observation, we investigate an alternative fairness approach: we add a second classification head to the network to explicitly predict the protected attribute (such as race or gender) alongside the original task. After training the two-headed network, we enforce demographic parity by merging the two heads, creating a network with the same architecture as the original network. We establish a close relationship between existing approaches and our approach by showing (1) that the decisions of a fair classifier are well-approximated by our approach, and (2) that an unfair and optimally accurate classifier can be recovered from a fair classifier and our second head predicting the protected attribute. We use our explicit formulation to argue that the existing fairness approaches, just as ours, demonstrate disparate treatment and that they are likely to be unlawful in a wide range of scenarios under US law.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑