arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2203.01435stat.ME
收藏

使用信息先验对嵌套贝叶斯因子的一般近似

A general approximation to nested Bayes factors with informed priors

František Bartoš, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

AI总结:

针对信息先验下传统贝叶斯因子近似失效的问题,提出一种仅需最大似然估计及其标准误的简单计算近似方法,促进了带信息先验的贝叶斯检验与再分析。

摘要:

作为贝叶斯模型比较和假设检验的重要内容,贝叶斯因子常被用于量化两个对立假设的相对预测性能。然而,贝叶斯因子的计算可能具有挑战性,这也促成了如 BIC 等便利近似方法的流行。不幸的是,这些近似在信息先验分布的情况下可能会失效。在此,我们通过概述对焦点参数 $θ$ 的信息贝叶斯因子的近似来解决这一问题。该近似在计算上很简单,仅需最大似然估计 $\hatθ$ 及其标准误。该近似使用 $θ$ 的估计似然,并假设 $θ$ 的后验分布不受干扰参数先验分布选择的影响。随后,使用 Savage--Dickey 密度比即可轻松获得零假设 $\mathcal{H}_0: θ= θ_0$ 与备择假设 $\mathcal{H}_1: θ\sim g(θ)$ 的贝叶斯因子。三个真实数据示例突显了与 bridge sampling 和 Laplace's method 相比,该近似的速度和接近程度。所提出的近似促进了对标准频率派结果的贝叶斯再分析,鼓励应用带信息先验的贝叶斯检验,并缓解了经常阻碍贝叶斯敏感性分析和贝叶斯因子设计分析的计算挑战。结果表明,在小样本量以及焦点参数的后验分布受到干扰参数先验分布显著影响时,该近似会变差。所提出的方法也可用于近似 $\mathcal{H}_1$ 下 $θ$ 的后验分布。

英文摘要:

A staple of Bayesian model comparison and hypothesis testing, Bayes factors are often used to quantify the relative predictive performance of two rival hypotheses. The computation of Bayes factors can be challenging, however, and this has contributed to the popularity of convenient approximations such as the BIC. Unfortunately, these approximations can fail in the case of informed prior distributions. Here we address this problem by outlining an approximation to informed Bayes factors for a focal parameter $θ$. The approximation is computationally simple and requires only the maximum likelihood estimate $\hatθ$ and its standard error. The approximation uses an estimated likelihood of $θ$ and assumes that the posterior distribution for $θ$ is unaffected by the choice of prior distribution for the nuisance parameters. The resulting Bayes factor for the null hypothesis $\mathcal{H}_0: θ= θ_0$ versus the alternative hypothesis $\mathcal{H}_1: θ\sim g(θ)$ is then easily obtained using the Savage--Dickey density ratio. Three real-data examples highlight the speed and closeness of the approximation compared to bridge sampling and Laplace's method. The proposed approximation facilitates Bayesian reanalyses of standard frequentist results, encourages application of Bayesian tests with informed priors, and alleviates the computational challenges that often frustrate both Bayesian sensitivity analyses and Bayes factor design analyses. The approximation is shown to suffer under small sample sizes and when the posterior distribution of the focal parameter is substantially influenced by the prior distributions on the nuisance parameters. The proposed methodology may also be used to approximate the posterior distribution for $θ$ under $\mathcal{H}_1$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑