arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.03192cs.AI
收藏

奖励是不够的:我们能否将人工智能从强化学习范式中解放出来?

Reward is not enough: can we liberate AI from the reinforcement learning paradigm?

Stanford(斯坦福大学)

Vacslav Glukhov

AI总结:

本文反驳奖励最大化足以解释智能的观点,指出强化学习范式不完整,并强调其对开发安全稳健AI的深远影响。

摘要:

我提出反对Silver、Singh、Precup和Sutton(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370221000862)所提出的假设的论据:奖励最大化不足以解释与自然智能和人工智能相关的许多活动,包括知识、学习、感知、社会智能、进化、语言、泛化和模仿。我表明这种“以盈利为目的的还原”(reductio ad lucrum)在知识渊源上可追溯至“经济人”(Homo economicus)的政治经济学,并与激进版本的行为主义有实质重叠。我论证了为什么强化学习范式,尽管在某些实际应用中显示出实用性,却是一个不完整的智能框架——无论是对于自然智能还是人工智能。智能行为的复杂性并非简单地在奖励最大化之上的二阶复杂化。这一事实对开发实用、智能、安全且稳健的人工智能体具有深远影响。

英文摘要:

I present arguments against the hypothesis put forward by Silver, Singh, Precup, and Sutton ( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370221000862 ) : reward maximization is not enough to explain many activities associated with natural and artificial intelligence including knowledge, learning, perception, social intelligence, evolution, language, generalisation and imitation. I show such reductio ad lucrum has its intellectual origins in the political economy of Homo economicus and substantially overlaps with the radical version of behaviourism. I show why the reinforcement learning paradigm, despite its demonstrable usefulness in some practical application, is an incomplete framework for intelligence -- natural and artificial. Complexities of intelligent behaviour are not simply second-order complications on top of reward maximisation. This fact has profound implications for the development of practically usable, smart, safe and robust artificially intelligent agents.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑