arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.01033math.OC
收藏

关于一类具有连续非凸下层问题的计算性态恶劣的双层问题

On a Computationally Ill-Behaved Bilevel Problem with a Continuous and Nonconvex Lower Level

Yasmine Beck, Daniel Bienstock, Martin Schmidt, Johannes Thürauf

AI总结:

该研究揭示了具有连续非凸下层的双层优化问题的计算困难:即使下层约束达到任意小的ε-可行性,所得解与真实解的偏差仍可能任意大,强调求解此类问题需格外谨慎,并指出下层非线性是恶劣性态的关键原因。

摘要:

众所周知,双层优化问题无论在理论还是实践中都难以求解。本文指出,求解具有连续但非凸下层问题的双层问题时,存在另一项计算层面的困难。即便下层问题的非线性约束求解达到了ε-可行性(ε为任意小的正数),得到的双层解及其目标值也可能与真实双层解及其真实目标值相差任意大。该结论甚至适用于满足以下全部条件的双层问题:非凸下层问题具有唯一解、严格互补条件成立、可行集是凸的,且所有可行的上层决策均满足Slater约束规范。由于在求解非凸问题的全局最优解时,ε-可行性的考量无法避免,我们的结果表明,处理具有连续非凸下层的计算性双层优化问题时必须极为谨慎。最后,我们通过证明线性双层问题至少在可行解层面的性态要好得多,说明下层问题中的非线性是导致上述恶劣性态的关键原因。

英文摘要:

It is well known that bilevel optimization problems are hard to solve both in theory and practice. In this paper, we highlight a further computational difficulty when it comes to solving bilevel problems with continuous but nonconvex lower levels. Even if the lower-level problem is solved to $\varepsilon$-feasibility regarding its nonlinear constraints for an arbitrarily small but positive $\varepsilon$, the obtained bilevel solution as well as its objective value may be arbitrarily far away from the actual bilevel solution and its actual objective value. This result even holds for bilevel problems for which the nonconvex lower level is uniquely solvable, for which the strict complementarity condition holds, for which the feasible set is convex, and for which Slater's constraint qualification is satisfied for all feasible upper-level decisions. Since the consideration of $\varepsilon$-feasibility cannot be avoided when solving nonconvex problems to global optimality, our result shows that computational bilevel optimization with continuous and nonconvex lower levels needs to be done with great care. Finally, we illustrate that the nonlinearities in the lower level are the key reason for the observed bad behavior by showing that linear bilevel problems behave much better at least on the level of feasible solutions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑