arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.13329cs.LGcs.CR

Can Adversarial Training Be Manipulated By Non-Robust Features?

Nanjing University(南京大学);Chongqing University(重庆大学);RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project(理化学研究所先进智能项目中心);Nanyang Technological University(南洋理工大学);JD AI Research(京东人工智能研究院);Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(南京航空航天大学)

Lue Tao, Lei Feng, Hongxin Wei, Jinfeng Yi, Sheng-Jun Huang, Songcan Chen

英文摘要:

Adversarial training, originally designed to resist test-time adversarial examples, has shown to be promising in mitigating training-time availability attacks. This defense ability, however, is challenged in this paper. We identify a novel threat model named stability attack, which aims to hinder robust availability by slightly manipulating the training data. Under this threat, we show that adversarial training using a conventional defense budget $ε$ provably fails to provide test robustness in a simple statistical setting, where the non-robust features of the training data can be reinforced by $ε$-bounded perturbation. Further, we analyze the necessity of enlarging the defense budget to counter stability attacks. Finally, comprehensive experiments demonstrate that stability attacks are harmful on benchmark datasets, and thus the adaptive defense is necessary to maintain robustness. Our code is available at https://github.com/TLMichael/Hypocritical-Perturbation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑