arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2209.14105cs.LG

Exploring the Relationship between Architecture and Adversarially Robust Generalization

SenseTime(商汤科技);Zhongguancun Laboratory(中关村实验室);Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center(合肥综合性国家科学中心);JD Explore Academy(京东探索研究院);Beihang University(北京航空航天大学);Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院);Zhejiang University(浙江大学)

Aishan Liu, Shiyu Tang, Siyuan Liang, Ruihao Gong, Boxi Wu, Xianglong Liu, Dacheng Tao

英文摘要:

Adversarial training has been demonstrated to be one of the most effective remedies for defending adversarial examples, yet it often suffers from the huge robustness generalization gap on unseen testing adversaries, deemed as the adversarially robust generalization problem. Despite the preliminary understandings devoted to adversarially robust generalization, little is known from the architectural perspective. To bridge the gap, this paper for the first time systematically investigated the relationship between adversarially robust generalization and architectural design. Inparticular, we comprehensively evaluated 20 most representative adversarially trained architectures on ImageNette and CIFAR-10 datasets towards multiple `p-norm adversarial attacks. Based on the extensive experiments, we found that, under aligned settings, Vision Transformers (e.g., PVT, CoAtNet) often yield better adversarially robust generalization while CNNs tend to overfit on specific attacks and fail to generalize on multiple adversaries. To better understand the nature behind it, we conduct theoretical analysis via the lens of Rademacher complexity. We revealed the fact that the higher weight sparsity contributes significantly towards the better adversarially robust generalization of Transformers, which can be often achieved by the specially-designed attention blocks. We hope our paper could help to better understand the mechanism for designing robust DNNs. Our model weights can be found at http://robust.art.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑