arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2201.12440cs.LG
收藏

在分布偏移下认证模型准确率

Certifying Model Accuracy under Distribution Shifts

University of Maryland(马里兰大学)

Aounon Kumar, Alexander Levine, Tom Goldstein, Soheil Feizi

AI总结:

本文提出在有界 Wasserstein 分布偏移下认证模型准确率的随机化框架,支持逐样本变化的扰动预算,并用于自然图像变换、对抗分布偏移及不可学习投毒数据集的性能下界证明。

摘要:

机器学习中的认证鲁棒性主要集中于对输入的对抗扰动,且对数据分布中的每个点采用固定攻击预算。在本工作中,我们针对数据分布的有界 Wasserstein 偏移,给出了关于模型准确率的可证明鲁棒性保证。我们表明,在一个变换空间内对模型输入进行随机化的简单过程,可被证明对该变换下的分布偏移具有鲁棒性。我们的框架允许特定于数据样本的扰动大小在输入分布中的不同点之间变化,并且具有足够的通用性,也能涵盖固定大小的扰动。对于原始分布周围 Wasserstein 球内输入分布的任何(自然或对抗)偏移,我们的认证都会产生模型性能的保证下界。我们将该技术应用于:(i) 认证针对图像自然(非对抗)变换的鲁棒性,例如颜色偏移、色调偏移以及亮度和饱和度变化;(ii) 认证针对输入分布对抗偏移的鲁棒性;以及 (iii) 对在所谓“不可学习”数据集上训练的模型的性能给出可证明的下界(困难性结果),这些数据集已被投毒以干扰模型训练。

英文摘要:

Certified robustness in machine learning has primarily focused on adversarial perturbations of the input with a fixed attack budget for each point in the data distribution. In this work, we present provable robustness guarantees on the accuracy of a model under bounded Wasserstein shifts of the data distribution. We show that a simple procedure that randomizes the input of the model within a transformation space is provably robust to distributional shifts under the transformation. Our framework allows the datum-specific perturbation size to vary across different points in the input distribution and is general enough to include fixed-sized perturbations as well. Our certificates produce guaranteed lower bounds on the performance of the model for any (natural or adversarial) shift of the input distribution within a Wasserstein ball around the original distribution. We apply our technique to: (i) certify robustness against natural (non-adversarial) transformations of images such as color shifts, hue shifts and changes in brightness and saturation, (ii) certify robustness against adversarial shifts of the input distribution, and (iii) show provable lower bounds (hardness results) on the performance of models trained on so-called "unlearnable" datasets that have been poisoned to interfere with model training.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑