arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2606.18839cs.LGcs.CV

视觉语言模型的语义鲁棒性认证

Semantic Robustness Certification for Vision-Language Models

School of Computing \& Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Australia

Peiyu Yang, Paul Montague, Feng Liu, Andrew C. Cullen, Amardeep Kaur, Christopher Leckie, Sarah M. Erfani

AI总结:

提出首个无需额外数据即可认证视觉语言模型在语义层面(如形状、大小、风格)鲁棒性的框架,通过文本提示作为语义代理并量化决策边界,确保预测类别在语义变换下不变。

摘要:

视觉语言模型(VLM)现在被广泛用于下游任务。然而,现实世界的应用常常使VLM面临由语义变化(例如形状、大小和风格)引起的分布偏移。鲁棒性认证确定当对输入应用变换时模型的预测是否改变。虽然大多数认证框架研究输入的几何或像素级变换,但本文提出了一种新颖的框架,能够在语义级变换下认证VLM的鲁棒性。利用VLM的开放词汇能力,我们使用文本提示作为语义代理来构建由控制语义变化程度的范围参数化的变换。通过以封闭形式表征VLM决策边界,我们的框架定量地认证了在语义变换下预测类别保持不变的范围区间。我们的框架是第一个在语义级变化下认证VLM鲁棒性而无需为每种变化提供额外数据的框架,使其易于应用。在合成数据和真实数据上的实验表明,我们的框架能够在各种场景下认证针对多种语义变化的鲁棒性。

英文摘要:

Vision-language models (VLMs) are now widely used in downstream tasks. However, real-world applications often expose VLMs to distribution shifts induced by semantic variation (e.g., shape, size, and style). Robustness certification determines if a model's prediction changes when transformations are applied to its input. While most certification frameworks study geometric or pixel-level transformations over inputs, this work proposes a novel framework that enables certifying VLM robustness under semantic-level transformations. Leveraging the open-vocabulary capability of VLMs, we use text prompts as semantic proxies to construct transformations parameterized by an extent that controls the degree of semantic variation. By characterizing the VLM decision boundary in closed form, our framework quantitatively certifies extent intervals for which the predicted class remains unchanged under the semantic transformation. Our framework is the first to certify VLM robustness under semantic-level variations without requiring additional data for each variation, making it practical to apply. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world data show that our framework enables certifying robustness under diverse semantic variations across scenarios.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑