arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.08060quant-ph

两模量子态在耗散环境下的演化:压缩还是纠缠,哪种量子资源存活更好?

Evolution of two-mode quantum states under a dissipative environment: which quantum resource survives better, squeezing or entanglement?

Rishabh, Chandan Kumar, Geetu Narang, Arvind

AI总结:

本研究探讨两模高斯态的压缩与纠缠在不同耗散环境下的相对鲁棒性,发现资源存活优劣取决于耗散环境性质与初始压缩量,可为量子信息处理协议选择更优资源以提升性能。

摘要:

我们探讨了在两种模式通过无源光学相互转换的量子资源——压缩与纠缠——在不同耗散环境下对两模高斯态的相对鲁棒性。当各模式与相同的局域浴相互作用时,纠缠与压缩以相同速率衰减。然而,当仅有一个模式与局域浴相互作用时,纠缠与压缩的相对鲁棒性取决于状态的初始压缩量。类似地,当系统与全局浴相互作用时,纠缠与压缩的鲁棒性同样取决于初始压缩量。因此,依据耗散环境的性质及状态的初始压缩量,人们可在压缩与纠缠中选择更鲁棒的资源形式以存储量子性。这可用于有效提升各类基于连续变量高斯态的量子信息处理协议的性能。

英文摘要:

We explore the relative robustness of squeezing and entanglement (which are quantum resources interconvertible via passive optics) for two-mode Gaussian states under different dissipative environments. When the individual modes interact with identical local baths, entanglement and squeezing decay at the same rate. However, when only one of the modes interacts with a local bath, the comparative robustness of entanglement and squeezing depends on the initial squeezing of the state. Similarly, when the system interacts with a global bath, the robustness of entanglement and squeezing depends on the initial squeezing. Thus depending on the nature of dissipative environments and the initial squeezing of the state, one can select the more robust form of resource out of squeezing and entanglement to store quantumness. This can be used to effectively enhance the performance of various quantum information processing protocols based on continuous variable Gaussian states.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑