arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.07905cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

CPTAM:成分句法树聚合方法

CPTAM: Constituency Parse Tree Aggregation Method

Iowa State University(爱荷华州立大学)

Adithya Kulkarni, Nasim Sabetpour, Alexey Markin, Oliver Eulenstein, Qi Li

AI总结:

针对不同成分句法分析器结果不一致的问题,提出基于truth discovery的聚合方法CPTAM,通过最小化RF距离加权和进行结构与标签聚合,在无ground truth下获得高质量句法树并有效评估分析器。

摘要:

各种自然语言处理任务采用成分句法分析,以根据短语结构语法理解句子的句法结构。目前已有许多最先进的成分句法分析器被提出,但对于相同的句子,它们可能会给出不同的结果,尤其是对于超出其训练领域的语料库。本文采用truth discovery思想,在没有ground truth的情况下,通过估计不同句法分析器的可靠性来聚合它们的成分句法树。我们的目标是持续获得高质量的聚合成分句法树。我们将成分句法树聚合问题分为两步:结构聚合和成分标签聚合。具体而言,我们通过最小化Robinson-Foulds(RF)距离的加权和,提出了首个针对树结构的truth discovery解决方案,RF距离是衡量两棵树之间差异的经典对称距离度量。我们在不同语言和领域的基准数据集上进行了大量实验。实验结果表明,我们的方法CPTAM优于最先进的聚合基线方法。我们还证明了CPTAM估计的权重能够在没有ground truth的情况下充分评估成分句法分析器。

英文摘要:

Diverse Natural Language Processing tasks employ constituency parsing to understand the syntactic structure of a sentence according to a phrase structure grammar. Many state-of-the-art constituency parsers are proposed, but they may provide different results for the same sentences, especially for corpora outside their training domains. This paper adopts the truth discovery idea to aggregate constituency parse trees from different parsers by estimating their reliability in the absence of ground truth. Our goal is to consistently obtain high-quality aggregated constituency parse trees. We formulate the constituency parse tree aggregation problem in two steps, structure aggregation and constituent label aggregation. Specifically, we propose the first truth discovery solution for tree structures by minimizing the weighted sum of Robinson-Foulds (RF) distances, a classic symmetric distance metric between two trees. Extensive experiments are conducted on benchmark datasets in different languages and domains. The experimental results show that our method, CPTAM, outperforms the state-of-the-art aggregation baselines. We also demonstrate that the weights estimated by CPTAM can adequately evaluate constituency parsers in the absence of ground truth.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑