arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.28131cs.CL

更好的头部并不能保证更好的二值化成分句法分析

Better heads do not guarantee better binarized constituency parsing

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ma Liu Shui, Hong Kong(香港中文大学,大屿山分校);The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada(不列颠哥伦比亚大学,温哥华,加拿大);Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Daejeon, South Korea(韩国科学技术院,大田,韩国)

Zeyao Qi, Yige Chen, Eitan Klinger, Vivaan Wadhwa, Jungyeul Park

AI总结:

本文研究了标点感知的树二值化方法,并探讨了依赖诱导的头部信息是否改善了二值化句法分析器的监督信号,发现尽管学习到的头部在内在头部预测上优于基于规则的头部,但在去二值化后并未带来一致的句法分析提升。

摘要:

我们重新审视了成分句法分析中标点感知的树二值化,并询问依赖诱导的头部信息是否改善了二值化句法分析器的监督信号。尽管学习到的头部在内在头部预测上显著优于基于规则的头部,但在去二值化后并未带来一致的句法分析提升。特别地,标点条件评估显示,在宏观平均标点敏感$F_1$上,学习到的头部表现不如基于规则的二值化,尽管在CTB上整体有小幅提升。类似的稳定性问题在跨树库迁移中也出现。这些结果表明,当用作二值化控制信号时,语言学的头部信息不一定对句法分析器最优。本文呈现了一个负面结果:更好的头部预测并不意味着更好的标点敏感成分句法分析。

英文摘要:

We revisit punctuation-aware tree binarization for constituency parsing and ask whether dependency-induced headedness improves binary parser supervision. Although learned heads substantially outperform rule-based heads in intrinsic head prediction, they do not yield consistent parsing gains after debinarization. In particular, punctuation-conditioned evaluation shows that learned headedness underperforms rule-based binarization in macro-average punctuation-sensitive $F_1$, despite a small overall gain on CTB. Similar instability appears under cross-treebank transfer. These results suggest that \ycc{linguistically grounded} headedness is not necessarily parser-optimal when used as a binarization control signal. The paper presents a negative result: better head prediction does not imply better punctuation-sensitive constituency parsing.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑