arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2201.06971cs.CRcs.CY
收藏

责任与隐私的识别

Identification for Accountability vs Privacy

Nick Pope, Geoffrey Goodell

摘要:

本文件审议了适用于身份管理的隐私和问责制的抵消要求。根据GDPR对身份属性的要求,提出了两种形式的身份,在隐私和责任之间具有不同的平衡,称为“公开认可的身份”和“特定于域的身份”。这些形式的身份可以使用“身份验证”进一步细化,并在GDPR中描述。这导致了不同形式的身份在问责制与隐私的光谱。建议数据处理系统在设计身份识别方案和采用方案时考虑隐私和问责制要求,从而考虑适当的身份形式。此外,用户应了解系统请求的身份形式的含义,以便他们能够决定是否可以接受。

英文摘要:

This document considers the counteracting requirements of privacy and accountability applied to identity management. Based on the requirements of GDPR applied to identity attributes, two forms of identity, with differing balances between privacy and accountability, are suggested, termed "publicly-recognised identity" and "domain-specific identity". These forms of identity can be further refined using "pseudonymisation" and as described in GDPR. This leads to the different forms of identity on the spectrum of accountability vs privacy. It is recommended that the privacy and accountability requirements, and hence the appropriate form of identity, are considered in designing an identification scheme and in the adoption of a scheme by data processing systems. Also, users should be aware of the implications of the form of identity requested by a system, so that they can decide whether this is acceptable.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑