arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2201.06912cs.SEcs.AIcs.HC
收藏

数字孪生:从概念到实践

Digital Twin: From Concept to Practice

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);Indian Institute of Science(印度科学理工学院)

Ashwin Agrawal, Martin Fischer, Vishal Singh

摘要:

最近的技术发展和人工智能(AI)的进步使复杂的功能成为数字孪生(DT)的一部分,几乎可以将自动化引入工作流程的各个方面。考虑到DT可以提供的这些可能性,实践者在实践中部署DT时选择哪些功能的决策越来越困难。在这方面缺乏研究也没有帮助。它导致了新兴技术能力的重新命名和重用,如预测,模拟,人工智能和机器学习(ML)作为DT的必要组成部分。在DT中不适当地选择能力可能会导致错失机会、战略偏差、过高的期望,以及被实践者当作炒作而拒绝的风险。为了缓解这一挑战,本文提出了数字化框架,设计和开发的设计科学研究(DSR)的方法,在为期18个月。该框架可以帮助从业者通过权衡每个级别的利弊,决定数字孪生系统的评估标准,并评估所选DT对组织流程和战略以及价值创造的影响,来选择DT的适当复杂程度。三个真实的案例研究说明了该框架的应用和实用性。

英文摘要:

Recent technological developments and advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have enabled sophisticated capabilities to be a part of Digital Twin (DT), virtually making it possible to introduce automation into all aspects of work processes. Given these possibilities that DT can offer, practitioners are facing increasingly difficult decisions regarding what capabilities to select while deploying a DT in practice. The lack of research in this field has not helped either. It has resulted in the rebranding and reuse of emerging technological capabilities like prediction, simulation, AI, and Machine Learning (ML) as necessary constituents of DT. Inappropriate selection of capabilities in a DT can result in missed opportunities, strategic misalignments, inflated expectations, and risk of it being rejected as just hype by the practitioners. To alleviate this challenge, this paper proposes the digitalization framework, designed and developed by following a Design Science Research (DSR) methodology over a period of 18 months. The framework can help practitioners select an appropriate level of sophistication in a DT by weighing the pros and cons for each level, deciding evaluation criteria for the digital twin system, and assessing the implications of the selected DT on the organizational processes and strategies, and value creation. Three real-life case studies illustrate the application and usefulness of the framework.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑