arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.00339stat.ME
收藏

用于项目反应数据的因子树 copula 模型

Factor tree copula models for item response data

Sayed H. Kadhem, Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos

AI总结:

本文融合因子 copula 与截断 vine copula,提出因子树 copula 模型,在保留潜变量可解释性的同时建模残差依赖,并给出估计、模型选择算法、模拟验证及 PTSD 应用。

摘要:

当依赖性可以通过潜变量解释时,用于项目反应数据的因子 copula 模型比(截断)vine copula 模型更具可解释性且拟合更好,但它们对条件独立性假设被违背的情况并不稳健。为规避这些问题,本文将用于项目反应数据的截断 vine 模型与因子 copula 模型结合起来,定义了一个组合模型,即所谓的因子树 copula 模型,使其同时受益于两种方法各自的优点。本文没有通过增加因子而导致计算问题以及解释和识别上的困难,而是在给定一个或两个潜变量的条件下,对残差假定一个截断 vine 结构。该结构可以更好地解释为在少数可解释潜变量给定时的条件依赖。一方面,因子模型的简约特性得以完整保留;另一方面,任何残差依赖性也都被纳入考虑。本文讨论了估计以及模型选择。具体而言,我们提出了模型选择算法,以选择一个合理的因子树 copula 模型,从而捕捉项目反应之间的(残差)依赖性。我们的一般方法通过一项广泛的模拟研究得到证明,并通过分析创伤后应激障碍(Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)数据加以说明。

英文摘要:

Factor copula models for item response data are more interpretable and fit better than (truncated) vine copula models when dependence can be explained through latent variables, but are not robust to violations of conditional independence. To circumvent these issues, truncated vines and factor copula models for item response data are joined to define a combined model, the so-called factor tree copula model, with individual benefits from each of the two approaches. Rather than adding factors and causing computational problems and difficulties in interpretation and identification, a truncated vine structure is assumed on the residuals conditional on one or two latent variables. This structure can be better explained as a conditional dependence given a few interpretable latent variables. On the one hand, the parsimonious feature of factor models remains intact and any residual dependencies are being taken into account on the other. We discuss estimation along with model selection. In particular, we propose model selection algorithms to choose a plausible factor tree copula model to capture the (residual) dependencies among the item responses. Our general methodology is demonstrated with an extensive simulation study and illustrated by analyzing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑