arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2111.07652nucl-thhep-ph
收藏

Elab = 1.58 AGeV时Ag+Ag碰撞重离子输运模拟的比较

Comparison of heavy ion transport simulations: Ag+Ag collisions at Elab = 1.58 AGeV

Tom Reichert, Alexander Elz, Taesoo Song, Gabriele Coci, Michael Winn, Elena Bratkovskaya, Jörg Aichelin, Jan Steinheimer, Marcus Bleicher

摘要:

我们比较微观输运模型UrQMD,PHSD,PHQMD和SMASH,以预测即将到来的Ag+Ag数据在$E_\mathrm{lab}=1.58$ ~ $A$ GeV($\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=2.55$ ~GeV)的HADES合作。我们研究了这些模型中质子、$π^{\pm,0}$、$K^\pm$、$η$、$Λ+Σ^0$和$Ξ^-$的多重数、光谱和有效源温度。尽管在不同的模型中的动力学的详细实施的变化,所采用的运输方法都显示出一致的多重性的大部分调查强子。主要的区别在于$Ξ^-$的产生,一方面,UrQMD/SMASH采用高质量共振态,明确衰变到$\mathrm{Resonance}\rightarrow Ξ+K+K$,而PHSD/PHQMD仅考虑非共振$Ξ$产生通道。的光谱,总结有效源温度的比较表明,所有的模型提供类似的源温度周围的$T_\mathrm{source}=80-95$ ~MeV,并显示大量的径向流的顺序上的$\langle v_T\rangle=0.22c-0.3c$,即使是这样一个小系统。

英文摘要:

We compare the microscopic transport models UrQMD, PHSD, PHQMD, and SMASH to make predictions for the upcoming Ag+Ag data at $E_\mathrm{lab}=1.58$~$A$GeV ($\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=2.55$~GeV) by the HADES collaboration. We study multiplicities, spectra and effective source temperatures of protons, $π^{\pm,0}$, $K^\pm$, the $η$, $Λ+Σ^0$ and the $Ξ^-$ within these models. Despite variations in the detailed implementation of the dynamics in the different models, the employed transport approaches all show consistent multiplicities of the bulk of investigated hadrons. The main differences are in the $Ξ^-$ production, which is treated differently between UrQMD/SMASH on one side employing high mass resonance states with explicit decays to $\mathrm{Resonance}\rightarrow Ξ+K+K$ in contrast to PHSD/PHQMD which account only non-resonant $Ξ$ production channels. A comparison of the spectra, summarized by effective source temperatures, shows that all models provide similar source temperatures around $T_\mathrm{source}=80-95$~MeV, and show substantial radial flow on the order of $\langle v_T\rangle=0.22c-0.3c$ even for such a small system.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑