arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2109.13601math.STstat.TH
收藏

稀疏序列的尖锐多重检验边界

Sharp multiple testing boundary for sparse sequences

Kweku Abraham, Ismael Castillo, Etienne Roquain

AI总结:

本研究在稀疏序列模型中确定了多重检验的尖锐极小极大风险边界,并提供了达到该边界的自适应程序(如调整水平的Benjamini--Hochberg和经验贝叶斯局部FDR),发现FNR在边界处占主导,并扩展至分类损失和大信号情形。

摘要:

本研究通过考虑稀疏序列模型中的极小极大分离速率来研究多重检验问题,其中检验风险以FDR+FNR(错误发现率加错误否定率)之和来衡量。首先,使用流行的beta-min分离条件(所有非零信号与0的间隔至少为某个量),我们渐近地确定了尖锐的极小极大检验风险,从而明确描述了从“可实现且风险趋于零的多重检验”到“不可能的多重检验”的转变。提供了达到相应最优边界的自适应多重检验程序:具有适当调整水平的Benjamini--Hochberg程序,以及经验贝叶斯$\ell$-值(“局部FDR”)程序。我们证明了对于大多数最优程序,FDR和FNR对检验风险的贡献是不对称的,其中FNR部分在边界处占主导地位。随后,针对任意稀疏信号类别研究了多重检验的难度。还探讨了若干扩展,包括分类损失的结果以及大信号情况下的收敛速率。

英文摘要:

This work investigates multiple testing by considering minimax separation rates in the sparse sequence model, when the testing risk is measured as the sum FDR+FNR (False Discovery Rate plus False Negative Rate). First using the popular beta-min separation condition, with all nonzero signals separated from $0$ by at least some amount, we determine the sharp minimax testing risk asymptotically and thereby explicitly describe the transition from "achievable multiple testing with vanishing risk" to "impossible multiple testing". Adaptive multiple testing procedures achieving the corresponding optimal boundary are provided: the Benjamini--Hochberg procedure with a properly tuned level, and an empirical Bayes $\ell$-value (`local FDR') procedure. We prove that the FDR and FNR make non-symmetric contributions to the testing risk for most optimal procedures, the FNR part being dominant at the boundary. The multiple testing hardness is then investigated for classes of arbitrary sparse signals. A number of extensions, including results for classification losses and convergence rates in the case of large signals, are also investigated.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑