arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2109.09762astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph
收藏

来自MHD星系形成模拟的首批预测宇宙射线能谱、主次粒子比与电离率

First Predicted Cosmic Ray Spectra, Primary-to-Secondary Ratios, and Ionization Rates from MHD Galaxy Formation Simulations

Philip F. Hopkins, Iryna S. Butsky, Georgia V. Panopoulou, Suoqing Ji, Eliot Quataert, Claude-Andre Faucher-Giguere, Dusan Keres

AI总结:

本研究利用含恒星形成反馈的MHD星系模拟,首次演化出MeV-TeV段分辨宇宙射线能谱,通过与太阳邻域观测对比,验证了单幂律注入模型的合理性,并揭示了星系周介质、输运过程、加速阶段等对宇宙射线特性的关键影响。

摘要:

我们展示了首批在包含恒星形成与反馈的实时动力学-磁流体力学(MHD)星系模拟中,演化MeV-TeV能量段(含电子、正电子、(反)质子及更重原子核)的分辨宇宙射线(CR)能谱的模拟研究。我们采用了包含历史模型中常被忽略项的新型数值方法,将具有唯象散射系数$\nu$的银河系类似物与太阳邻域(LISM)观测结果(能谱、B/C比、$e^{+}/e^{-}$比、$\bar{p}/p$比、$^{10}$Be/$^{9}$Be比、电离率、$\gamma$射线)进行对比。研究表明,采用简单的单幂律注入与随刚度$R$标度的散射系数即可重现观测结果,这与此前的非动力学计算结果类似。我们还发现:(1)真实星系的星系周介质必然会形成一个约10千秒差距的宇宙射线散射晕,影响所需的$\nu(R)$取值。(2)提高$\nu(R)$的归一化值会重新标度宇宙射线次级粒子能谱,同时由于源分布与损失效应,也会改变初级粒子的能谱斜率。(3)扩散/湍流再加速作用并不重要,通常弱于回旋共振/流逸损失,而后者又弱于由约0.1-1千秒差距的湍流/喷泉运动主导的绝热/对流项。(4)宇宙射线能谱在不同星系间差异显著;某些特征可能源于局地结构而非输运物理过程。(5)太阳邻域与分子云之间(或不同银河系位置间)宇宙射线电离率的系统性差异可自然产生,无需引入其他源。(6)CNO核的丰度表明,大部分宇宙射线加速发生在超新星(SNe)中形成反向激波的阶段,而非OB星风泡阶段或超新星遗迹后期的塞多夫-泰勒阶段。

英文摘要:

We present the first simulations evolving resolved spectra of cosmic rays (CRs) from MeV-TeV energies (including electrons, positrons, (anti)protons, and heavier nuclei), in live kinetic-MHD galaxy simulations with star formation and feedback. We utilize new numerical methods including terms often neglected in historical models, comparing Milky Way analogues with phenomenological scattering coefficients $ν$ to Solar-neighborhood (LISM) observations (spectra, B/C, $e^{+}/e^{-}$, $\bar{p}/p$, $^{10}$Be/$^{9}$Be, ionization, $γ$-rays). We show it is possible to reproduce observations with simple single-power-law injection and scattering coefficients (scaling with rigidity $R$), similar to previous (non-dynamical) calculations. We also find: (1) The circum-galactic medium in realistic galaxies necessarily imposes a $\sim10\,$kpc CR scattering halo, influencing the required $ν(R)$. (2) Increasing the normalization of $ν(R)$ re-normalizes CR secondary spectra but also changes primary spectral slopes, owing to source distribution and loss effects. (3) Diffusive/turbulent reacceleration is unimportant and generally sub-dominant to gyroresonant/streaming losses, which are sub-dominant to adiabatic/convective terms dominated by $\sim0.1-1\,$kpc turbulent/fountain motions. (4) CR spectra vary considerably across galaxies; certain features can arise from local structure rather than transport physics. (5) Systematic variation in CR ionization rates between LISM and molecular clouds (or Galactic position) arises naturally without invoking alternative sources. (6) Abundances of CNO nuclei require most CR acceleration occurs around when reverse shocks form in SNe, not in OB wind bubbles or later Sedov-Taylor stages of SNe remnants.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑