arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2109.07445cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.LG
收藏

反量化语言模型的挑战

Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models

DeepMind

Johannes Welbl, Amelia Glaese, Jonathan Uesato, Sumanth Dathathri, John Mellor, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Kirsty Anderson, Pushmeet Kohli, Ben Coppin, Po-Sen Huang

摘要:

大语言模型(LM)生成非常流畅的文本,并且可以有效地适应NLP任务。在安全性方面测量和保证生成的文本的质量对于在现实世界中部署LM是必不可少的;为此,先前的工作通常依赖于LM毒性的自动评估。我们批判性地讨论这种方法,评估几个毒性缓解策略方面的自动和人工评价,并分析毒性缓解的后果模型偏差和LM质量。我们证明,虽然基本的干预策略可以有效地优化以前建立的自动指标的RealToxicityObjectives数据集,这是在减少LM覆盖的文本,方言,边缘化群体的成本。此外,我们发现,人类评分者往往不同意高自动毒性评分后,强烈的毒性降低干预-进一步突出了细微差别,涉及仔细评估LM毒性。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LM) generate remarkably fluent text and can be efficiently adapted across NLP tasks. Measuring and guaranteeing the quality of generated text in terms of safety is imperative for deploying LMs in the real world; to this end, prior work often relies on automatic evaluation of LM toxicity. We critically discuss this approach, evaluate several toxicity mitigation strategies with respect to both automatic and human evaluation, and analyze consequences of toxicity mitigation in terms of model bias and LM quality. We demonstrate that while basic intervention strategies can effectively optimize previously established automatic metrics on the RealToxicityPrompts dataset, this comes at the cost of reduced LM coverage for both texts about, and dialects of, marginalized groups. Additionally, we find that human raters often disagree with high automatic toxicity scores after strong toxicity reduction interventions -- highlighting further the nuances involved in careful evaluation of LM toxicity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑