arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2108.04840cs.CLcs.LGcs.NE

神经自然语言处理的事后可解释性:综述

Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Survey

École Polytechnique de Montréal(蒙特利尔综合理工学院);Mila(米拉研究所);McGill University(麦吉尔大学);Facebook(脸书)

Andreas Madsen, Siva Reddy, Sarath Chandar

AI总结:

本文综述了神经自然语言处理中的事后可解释性方法,系统分类其解释方式、深入分析各类方法并讨论验证问题,以促进模型的安全、伦理与问责。

摘要:

用于自然语言处理的神经网络正变得越来越复杂和普及,人们日益担忧这些模型是否能够负责任地使用。解释模型有助于解决安全与伦理问题,并且对于问责制至关重要。可解释性旨在以人类能够理解的方式提供这些解释。此外,事后方法在模型学习完成之后提供解释,并且通常与模型无关。本综述对近期事后可解释性方法如何向人类传达解释进行了分类,深入讨论了每种方法,并探讨了它们如何被验证,因为后者往往是一个常见的关注点。

英文摘要:

Neural networks for NLP are becoming increasingly complex and widespread, and there is a growing concern if these models are responsible to use. Explaining models helps to address the safety and ethical concerns and is essential for accountability. Interpretability serves to provide these explanations in terms that are understandable to humans. Additionally, post-hoc methods provide explanations after a model is learned and are generally model-agnostic. This survey provides a categorization of how recent post-hoc interpretability methods communicate explanations to humans, it discusses each method in-depth, and how they are validated, as the latter is often a common concern.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑