arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2107.05693cs.CLcs.LG

Quantifying Explainability in NLP and Analyzing Algorithms for Performance-Explainability Tradeoff

Digital Reasoning / Smarsh, Inc(Digital Reasoning / Smarsh公司)

Mitchell Naylor, Christi French, Samantha Terker, Uday Kamath

英文摘要:

The healthcare domain is one of the most exciting application areas for machine learning, but a lack of model transparency contributes to a lag in adoption within the industry. In this work, we explore the current art of explainability and interpretability within a case study in clinical text classification, using a task of mortality prediction within MIMIC-III clinical notes. We demonstrate various visualization techniques for fully interpretable methods as well as model-agnostic post hoc attributions, and we provide a generalized method for evaluating the quality of explanations using infidelity and local Lipschitz across model types from logistic regression to BERT variants. With these metrics, we introduce a framework through which practitioners and researchers can assess the frontier between a model's predictive performance and the quality of its available explanations. We make our code available to encourage continued refinement of these methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑