arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
看起来今天可以划水了
arXiv 2108.01092astro-ph.SR
收藏

标准恒星光度;在盖亚之后的时代,什么是典型的和限制性的精度?

Standard stellar luminosities; what are typical and limiting accuracies in the era after Gaia?

Z. Eker, F. Soydugan, S. Bilir, V. Bakis

摘要:

对恒星光度(L)的获取方法进行了修订,并定义了标准恒星光度的新概念。三种方法中,第三种方法是利用从恒星的流量比中提取的恒星的独特的热辐射校正(BC),($f_{\rm V}/f_{\rm Bol}$)从具有足够光谱覆盖和分辨率的观测光谱获得,被估计为提供通常处于低百分比的不确定性($ΔL/L$),其可以精确到1%或者更高。比较了三种方法预测L的典型不确定度和极限不确定度。需要预先确定非唯一BC或MLR的次级方法被发现提供比直接方法更不准确的光度,直接方法可以提供8.2% - 12.2%的典型精度,而其估计的极限精度为2.5%。

英文摘要:

Methods of obtaining stellar luminosities (L) have been revised and a new concept, standard stellar luminosity, has been defined. Among the three methods (direct method from radii and effective temperatures, method using a mass-luminosity relation (MLR), and method requiring a bolometric correction), the third method, which uses the unique bolometric correction (BC) of a star extracted from a flux ratio ($f_{\rm V}/f_{\rm Bol}$) obtained from the observed spectrum with sufficient spectral coverage and resolution, is estimated to provide an uncertainty ($ΔL/L$) typically at a low percentage, which could be as accurate as 1% perhaps more. The typical and limiting uncertainties of the predicted L of the three methods were compared. The secondary methods requiring either a pre-determined non-unique BC or MLR were found to provide less accurate luminosities than the direct method, which could provide stellar luminosities with a typical accuracy of 8.2% - 12.2% while its estimated limiting accuracy is 2.5%.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑