arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2107.10652cs.CLcs.LG
收藏

使用出院总结的自动ICD编码和分类系统的系统性文献综述

A Systematic Literature Review of Automated ICD Coding and Classification Systems using Discharge Summaries

Western Sydney University(西悉尼大学)

Rajvir Kaur, Jeewani Anupama Ginige, Oliver Obst

摘要:

自由文本临床叙述的编码长期以来被认为有利于二次使用,如资金,保险索赔处理和研究。目前分配代码的方案是一个非常昂贵、耗时且容易出错的手动过程。近年来,许多研究人员研究了使用自然语言处理(NLP)、相关的机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)方法和技术来解决临床叙述的手动编码问题,并帮助人类编码器更准确和高效地分配临床代码。本系统性文献综述全面概述了自动化临床编码系统,该系统利用适当的NLP、ML和DL方法和技术为出院小结分配ICD代码。我们遵循系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并在2010年1月至2020年12月的四个学术数据库(PubMed、ScienceDirect、计算机协会(ACM)数字图书馆和计算语言学协会(ACL)选集)中对出版物进行了全面检索。我们审查了7,556篇出版物; 38篇符合纳入标准。这次审查确定:具有出院摘要的数据集; NLP技术以及一些其他数据提取过程,不同的特征提取和嵌入技术。为了衡量分类方法的性能,使用不同的评估指标。最后,对未来ICD码自动赋码的研究方向进行了展望。仍需努力提高ICD编码预测的准确性,使用最新版本的分类系统提供大规模去识别临床语料库。这可以成为一个指导和分享知识的平台,与经验不足的程序员和研究人员。

英文摘要:

Codification of free-text clinical narratives have long been recognised to be beneficial for secondary uses such as funding, insurance claim processing and research. The current scenario of assigning codes is a manual process which is very expensive, time-consuming and error prone. In recent years, many researchers have studied the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP), related Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods and techniques to resolve the problem of manual coding of clinical narratives and to assist human coders to assign clinical codes more accurately and efficiently. This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of automated clinical coding systems that utilises appropriate NLP, ML and DL methods and techniques to assign ICD codes to discharge summaries. We have followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search of publications from January, 2010 to December 2020 in four academic databases- PubMed, ScienceDirect, Association for Computing Machinery(ACM) Digital Library, and the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL) Anthology. We reviewed 7,556 publications; 38 met the inclusion criteria. This review identified: datasets having discharge summaries; NLP techniques along with some other data extraction processes, different feature extraction and embedding techniques. To measure the performance of classification methods, different evaluation metrics are used. Lastly, future research directions are provided to scholars who are interested in automated ICD code assignment. Efforts are still required to improve ICD code prediction accuracy, availability of large-scale de-identified clinical corpora with the latest version of the classification system. This can be a platform to guide and share knowledge with the less experienced coders and researchers.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑