arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2107.09487physics.soc-phcs.SI
收藏

论图中的节点排序

On node ranking in graphs

Ekaterina Dudkina, Michelangelo Bin, Jane Breen, Emanuele Crisostomi, Pietro Ferraro, Steve Kirkland, Jakub Marecek, Roderick Murray-Smith, Thomas Parisini, Lew… 展开作者

Ekaterina Dudkina, Michelangelo Bin, Jane Breen, Emanuele Crisostomi, Pietro Ferraro, Steve Kirkland, Jakub Marecek, Roderick Murray-Smith, Thomas Parisini, Lewi Stone, Serife Yilmaz, Robert Shorten

AI总结:

受新冠疫情应用启发,本文综述无向无权图节点排序经典方法,在含社区结构的真实基准网络中对比性能,并推广Newman基准网络以分析加权场景下的排序变化。

摘要:

根据节点的“重要性”对网络中的节点进行排序是一个经典问题,近几十年来一直受到不同科学领域的关注。近期新冠疫情重新激发了人们对该问题的兴趣,因为它涉及在无症状人群中选择应检测的个体,或确定应优先接种疫苗的个体。受新冠传播动力学的启发,本文综述了无向无权图中最流行的节点排序方法,并在考虑社会基于社区结构的真实基准网络中比较了它们的性能。此外,我们推广了Newman最初提出的用于无权图节点排序的经典基准网络,以展示加权情况下排序如何变化。

英文摘要:

The ranking of nodes in a network according to their ``importance'' is a classic problem that has attracted the interest of different scientific communities in the last decades. The current COVID-19 pandemic has recently rejuvenated the interest in this problem, as it is related to the selection of which individuals should be tested in a population of asymptomatic individuals, or which individuals should be vaccinated first. Motivated by the COVID-19 spreading dynamics, in this paper we review the most popular methods for node ranking in undirected unweighted graphs, and compare their performance in a benchmark realistic network, that takes into account the community-based structure of society. Also, we generalize a classic benchmark network originally proposed by Newman for ranking nodes in unweighted graphs, to show how ranks change in the weighted case.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑