arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2107.08438quant-phphysics.atom-ph
收藏

基于量子逻辑冷却和读出的具有(反)质子磁矩的CPT测试

CPT test with (anti-)proton magnetic moments based on quantum logic cooling and readout

M. Niemann, A. -G. Paschke, T. Dubielzig, S. Ulmer, C. Ospelkaus

摘要:

德梅尔特和范戴克在1987年对电子和正电子g因子的著名测量仍然是轻子领域最精确的g因子比较,也是对可能的CPT破坏的敏感测试。质子和反质子之间的互补g因子比较是非常可取的测试CPT对称性的重子部门。目前的实验,基于Dehmelt的连续Stern-Gerlach效应和双潘宁阱技术,正在取得迅速进展。然而,它们极难实现,因为使用低温技术对重子进行基态冷却实际上是不可能的,而且因为连续的斯特恩-格拉赫效应的尺度为$μ$ /m,其中m是粒子的质量,$μ$是它的磁矩。这两个困难最终都会限制准确性。我们讨论的实验前景实现的另一种方法的g-因子比较与单(反)质子,量子逻辑技术的基础上提出的Heinzen和Wineland和Wineland等人。的基本思想是冷却,控制和测量单(反)质子通过相互作用与一个良好控制的原子离子。

英文摘要:

Dehmelt and VanDyck's famous 1987 measurement of the electron and positron g-factor is still the most precise g-factor comparison in the lepton sector, and a sensitive test of possible CPT violation. A complementary g-factor comparison between the proton and the antiproton is highly desirable to test CPT symmetry in the baryon sector. Current experiments, based on Dehmelt's continuous Stern-Gerlach effect and the double Penning-trap technique, are making rapid progress. They are, however, extremely difficult to carry out because ground state cooling using cryogenic techniques is virtually impossible for heavy baryons, and because the continous Stern-Gerlach effect scales as $μ$/m, where m is the mass of the particle and $μ$ its magnetic moment. Both difficulties will ultimately limit the accuracy. We discuss experimental prospects of realizing an alternative approach to a g-factor comparison with single (anti)protons, based on quantum logic techniques proposed by Heinzen and Wineland and by Wineland et al. The basic idea is to cool, control and measure single (anti-)protons through interaction with a well-controlled atomic ion.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑