arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2107.07575math.STstat.MEstat.TH

中介分析中复合零假设的最优检验

Optimal tests of the composite null hypothesis arising in mediation analysis

Columbia University(哥伦比亚大学);Université Paris Cité, CNRS, MAP5(巴黎西岱大学,法国国家科学研究中心,MAP5)

Caleb H. Miles, Antoine Chambaz

AI总结:

针对中介分析中复合零假设检验原点附近功效不足的问题,提出极小极大最优闭式检验与近似最优贝叶斯风险检验,适配大规模检验并提供R包实现。

摘要:

在特定因果及回归建模假设下,暴露通过中介变量对结局产生的间接效应可由两个回归系数的乘积识别。此情形下,无间接效应的零假设为复合零假设,因为当两个回归系数中任意一个为零时,零假设成立。结果是,传统假设检验在原点附近(即两个系数相对于标准误差均较小时)的功效严重不足。我们提出的假设检验满足:(i)维持α水平的第一类错误;(ii)当两个真实潜在效应相对于样本量均较小时,显著提升功效;(iii)当至少一个效应非小时,维持原有功效。一种方法给出闭式检验,该检验在备择参数空间上针对局部功效是极小极大最优的;另一种方法采用稀疏线性规划,生成贝叶斯风险准则下的近似最优检验。我们讨论了适用于大规模假设检验的适配方法,以及可提升可解释性的修正方案,并提供了实现所提方法的R包。

英文摘要:

The indirect effect of an exposure on an outcome through an intermediate variable can be identified by a product of two regression coefficients under certain causal and regression modeling assumptions. In this context, the null hypothesis of no indirect effect is a composite null hypothesis, as the null holds if either regression coefficient is zero. A consequence is that traditional hypothesis tests are severely underpowered near the origin (i.e., when both coefficients are small with respect to standard errors). We propose hypothesis tests that (i) preserve level alpha type 1 error, (ii) meaningfully improve power when both true underlying effects are small relative to sample size, and (iii) preserve power when at least one is not. One approach gives a closed-form test that is minimax optimal with respect to local power over the alternative parameter space. Another uses sparse linear programming to produce an approximately optimal test for a Bayes risk criterion. We discuss adaptations for performing large-scale hypothesis testing as well as modifications that yield improved interpretability. We provide an R package that implements our proposed methodology.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑