基于出版物的文章处理费：价格在多大程度上解释了科学影响？
Article Processing Charges based publications: to which extent the price explains scientific impact?
摘要：
本研究旨在分析科学出版物的引文标准化得分（NCS）与黄金开放获取出版物的文章处理费（APC）之间的关系。为此，我们使用OpenAPC数据库提供的APC信息和Web of Science数据库（WoS）中出版物的引用分数。数据库涵盖了2006年至2019年期间，在属于267个不同出版商的4751种期刊上发表了83，752篇文章。结果表明，与这一信念相反，付出高昂的代价并不一定会增加出版物的影响。首先，影响力大的大型出版商并不是最昂贵的。其次，APC最高的出版商不一定是影响力最好的出版商。装甲运兵车与影响之间的相关性中等。此外，在计量经济学分析中，我们已经表明，出版质量在很大程度上取决于其出版的期刊质量。国际合作在引文得分中也起着重要作用。
英文摘要：
The present study aims to analyze relationship between Citations Normalized Score (NCS) of scientific publications and Article Processing Charges (APCs) amounts of Gold Open access publications. To do so, we use APCs information provided by OpenAPC database and citations scores of publications in the Web of Science database (WoS). Database covers the period from 2006 to 2019 with 83,752 articles published in 4751 journals belonging to 267 distinct publishers. Results show that contrary to this belief, paying dearly does not necessarily increase the impact of publications. First, large publishers with high impact are not the most expensive. Second, publishers with the highest APCs are not necessarily the best in terms of impact. Correlation between APCs and impact is moderate. Otherwise, in the econometric analysis we have shown that publication quality is strongly determined by journal quality in which it is published. International collaboration also plays an important role in citations score.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
