arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2107.04566cs.LGcs.HCeess.SP
收藏

基于多模态融合的ECG多级应力评估

Multi-level Stress Assessment from ECG in a Virtual Reality Environment using Multimodal Fusion

Ryerson University(瑞尔森大学)

Zeeshan Ahmad, Suha Rabbani, Muhammad Rehman Zafar, Syem Ishaque, Sridhar Krishnan, Naimul Khan

摘要:

ECG是一个有吸引力的选择,以评估严重的虚拟现实(VR)的应用,由于其非侵入性。然而,现有的机器学习(ML)模型表现不佳。此外,现有的研究只进行了二元压力评估,而要开发更吸引人的基于生物反馈的应用程序,需要多层次的评估。现有的研究将单一体验(例如观看VR视频)注释并分类为单一压力水平,这再次阻碍了可以利用实时游戏内压力评估的动态体验的设计。在本文中,我们报告了我们的研究结果的VR压力评估,其中三个压力水平进行了评估。ECG数据收集自9名体验VR过山车的用户。然后,由三名评分员在10秒内将VR体验手动标记为三个压力水平。然后,我们提出了一种新的多模态深度融合模型,利用频谱图和1D ECG,可以从1秒的窗口提供压力预测。实验结果表明,该模型优于经典的基于HRV的ML模型(准确度提高9%)和基线深度学习模型(准确度提高2.5%)。我们还报告了基准WESAD数据集的结果,以显示该模型的优越性。

英文摘要:

ECG is an attractive option to assess stress in serious Virtual Reality (VR) applications due to its non-invasive nature. However, the existing Machine Learning (ML) models perform poorly. Moreover, existing studies only perform a binary stress assessment, while to develop a more engaging biofeedback-based application, multi-level assessment is necessary. Existing studies annotate and classify a single experience (e.g. watching a VR video) to a single stress level, which again prevents design of dynamic experiences where real-time in-game stress assessment can be utilized. In this paper, we report our findings on a new study on VR stress assessment, where three stress levels are assessed. ECG data was collected from 9 users experiencing a VR roller coaster. The VR experience was then manually labeled in 10-seconds segments to three stress levels by three raters. We then propose a novel multimodal deep fusion model utilizing spectrogram and 1D ECG that can provide a stress prediction from just a 1-second window. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms the classical HRV-based ML models (9% increase in accuracy) and baseline deep learning models (2.5% increase in accuracy). We also report results on the benchmark WESAD dataset to show the supremacy of the model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑