arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2106.02540cs.LGcs.MAcs.NI
收藏

用于5G及更高网络的可转移和分布式用户关联策略

Transferable and Distributed User Association Policies for 5G and Beyond Networks

CEA-Leti(原子能和替代能源委员会电子与信息技术实验室);Université Grenoble Alpes(格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学);Athonet(Athonet公司)

Mohamed Sana, Nicola di Pietro, Emilio Calvanese Strinati

摘要:

我们研究的问题,用户关联,即找到最佳的分配用户设备的基站,以实现有针对性的网络性能。在本文中,我们专注于关联策略的知识转移。事实上,传统的非平凡的用户关联方案往往是特定的或部署特定的,并需要重新设计或重新学习的策略时,用户的数量或位置的变化。相比之下,可转移性允许将针对特定场景设计的单个用户关联策略应用于其他不同的用户部署,而不需要大量的重新学习或重新设计阶段,并且大大降低了其计算和管理复杂性。为了实现可移植性,我们首先铸造用户关联作为一个多智能体强化学习问题。然后,基于我们专门为这种情况设想的神经注意力机制,我们提出了一种新的分布式策略网络架构,该架构具有zero-shot泛化能力,即,数值结果显示了我们的解决方案在整体网络通信速率方面的有效性,即使用户数量相对于初始训练点增加一倍,也优于集中式基准。

英文摘要:

We study the problem of user association, namely finding the optimal assignment of user equipment to base stations to achieve a targeted network performance. In this paper, we focus on the knowledge transferability of association policies. Indeed, traditional non-trivial user association schemes are often scenario-specific or deployment-specific and require a policy re-design or re-learning when the number or the position of the users change. In contrast, transferability allows to apply a single user association policy, devised for a specific scenario, to other distinct user deployments, without needing a substantial re-learning or re-design phase and considerably reducing its computational and management complexity. To achieve transferability, we first cast user association as a multi-agent reinforcement learning problem. Then, based on a neural attention mechanism that we specifically conceived for this context, we propose a novel distributed policy network architecture, which is transferable among users with zero-shot generalization capability i.e., without requiring additional training.Numerical results show the effectiveness of our solution in terms of overall network communication rate, outperforming centralized benchmarks even when the number of users doubles with respect to the initial training point.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑