arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2104.13299cs.AIcs.LG
收藏

From Human Explanation to Model Interpretability: A Framework Based on Weight of Evidence

Microsoft Research(微软研究院);University of Michigan(密歇根大学);University of Maryland(马里兰大学)

David Alvarez-Melis, Harmanpreet Kaur, Hal Daumé, Hanna Wallach, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan

英文摘要:

We take inspiration from the study of human explanation to inform the design and evaluation of interpretability methods in machine learning. First, we survey the literature on human explanation in philosophy, cognitive science, and the social sciences, and propose a list of design principles for machine-generated explanations that are meaningful to humans. Using the concept of weight of evidence from information theory, we develop a method for generating explanations that adhere to these principles. We show that this method can be adapted to handle high-dimensional, multi-class settings, yielding a flexible framework for generating explanations. We demonstrate that these explanations can be estimated accurately from finite samples and are robust to small perturbations of the inputs. We also evaluate our method through a qualitative user study with machine learning practitioners, where we observe that the resulting explanations are usable despite some participants struggling with background concepts like prior class probabilities. Finally, we conclude by surfacing~design~implications for interpretability tools in general.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑