arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2104.06013gr-qchep-th
收藏

对量子黑洞的经典热爱

Classical Love for Quantum Blackholes

Ram Brustein, Yotam Sherf

摘要:

我们提出了一种方法比较的经典和量子计算的电四极洛夫数$k_2$,并表明,我们以前的推导量子黑洞的量子洛夫数完全匹配的经典计算的$k_2$时,量子期望值被替换为相应的经典量,由玻尔对应原理。经典相对论恒星的$k_2$的标准推导依赖于在外部扰动场的存在下,在恒星表面上固定爱因斯坦方程的边界条件。另一种计算$k_2$的方法是利用恒星的非相对论流体模式的光谱特性。我们采用这种替代方法,并使用它来获得一个有效的描述的内部模式的驱动谐振子的集合,其特征在于不同的频率和振幅。比较了这两种经典的方法,发现大部分的内部信息都可以被积分出来,从而将计算$k_2$的问题简化为在变形恒星表面上固定一个扰动Einstein方程的边界条件。然后,我们确定这个单一的边界条件的光谱的对象,并着手确定经典量和量子期望值之间的关系,并验证有效的经典计算和量子计算的结果之间的协议。

英文摘要:

We present a method for comparing the classical and quantum calculations of the electric quadrupolar Love number $k_2$ and show that our previous derivation of the quantum Love number of a quantum blackhole matches exactly the classical calculation of $k_2$ when quantum expectation values are replaced by the corresponding classical quantities, as dictated by the Bohr correspondence principle. The standard derivation of $k_2$ for classical relativistic stars relies on fixing boundary conditions on the surface of the star for the Einstein equations in the presence of an external perturbing field. An alternative method for calculating $k_2$ uses properties of the spectrum of the non-relativistic fluid modes of the star. We adopt this alternative method and use it to derive an effective description of the interior modes in terms of a collection of driven harmonic oscillators characterized by different frequencies and amplitudes. We compare these two classical methods and find that most of the interior information can be integrated out, reducing the problem of calculating $k_2$ to fixing a single boundary condition for the perturbed Einstein equations on the surface of the deformed star. We then determine this single boundary condition in terms of the spectrum of the object and proceed to identify the relationship between classical quantities and quantum expectation values and to verify the agreement between the results of the effective classical calculation and the quantum calculation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑