arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2104.02145cs.CL
收藏

如何修复自然语言理解中的基准测试?

What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?

New York University(纽约大学);Google Research(谷歌研究院)

Samuel R. Bowman, George E. Dahl

摘要:

许多自然语言理解(NLU)任务的评估都被打破了:不可靠和有偏见的系统在标准基准测试中得分如此之高,以至于开发更好系统的研究人员几乎没有空间来展示他们的改进。最近的趋势是放弃IID基准测试,而采用逆向构造的、分布外的测试集,这确保了当前模型的性能很差,但最终只会掩盖我们希望基准测试测量的能力。在这份立场文件中,我们列出了我们认为NLU基准应该满足的四个标准。我们认为,目前大多数基准测试都未能达到这些标准,而对抗性的数据汇集并不能有意义地解决这些失败的原因。相反,恢复健康的评估生态系统将需要在基准数据集的设计、注释的可靠性、规模以及处理社会偏见的方式方面取得重大进展。

英文摘要:

Evaluation for many natural language understanding (NLU) tasks is broken: Unreliable and biased systems score so highly on standard benchmarks that there is little room for researchers who develop better systems to demonstrate their improvements. The recent trend to abandon IID benchmarks in favor of adversarially-constructed, out-of-distribution test sets ensures that current models will perform poorly, but ultimately only obscures the abilities that we want our benchmarks to measure. In this position paper, we lay out four criteria that we argue NLU benchmarks should meet. We argue most current benchmarks fail at these criteria, and that adversarial data collection does not meaningfully address the causes of these failures. Instead, restoring a healthy evaluation ecosystem will require significant progress in the design of benchmark datasets, the reliability with which they are annotated, their size, and the ways they handle social bias.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑