使用集成模式LCA的共享微型移动和个人替代方案的环境性能
Environmental performance of shared micromobility and personal alternatives using integrated modal LCA
摘要：
与私人替代品相比，共享微型移动服务的环境绩效从未使用依赖于现场数据的综合模式生命周期评估（LCA）进行过评估。这样的LCA是在巴黎的三种共享微移动服务上进行的-自行车，第二代电动滑板车和电动轻便摩托车-以及它们的私人替代品。计算了全球变暖潜势、一次能源消耗和三个端点的损害。对车辆寿命、运输、服务距离和电力组合进行了敏感性分析。电动微移动性介于主动模式和个人ICE模式之间。其影响在全球范围内受到汽车制造业的推动。所有权并不直接影响环境性能：车辆的寿命里程。评估唯一的碳足迹会导致有偏见的环境决策，因为它与三种损害无关：多标准LCA是保护地球的强制性要求。最后，生态设计现代交通政策需要重大的范式转变。
英文摘要：
The environmental performance of shared micromobility services compared to private alternatives has never been assessed using an integrated modal Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) relying on field data. Such an LCA is conducted on three shared micromobility services in Paris - bikes, second-generation e-scooters, and e-mopeds - and their private alternatives. Global warming potential, primary energy consumption, and the three endpoint damages are calculated. Sensitivity analyses on vehicle lifespan, shipping, servicing distance, and electricity mix are conducted. Electric micromobility ranks between active modes and personal ICE modes. Its impacts are globally driven by vehicle manufacturing. Ownership does not affect directly the environmental performance: the vehicle lifetime mileage does. Assessing the sole carbon footprint leads to biased environmental decision-making, as it is not correlated to the three damages: multicriteria LCA is mandatory to preserve the planet. Finally, a major change of paradigm is needed to eco-design modern transportation policies.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
