arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2102.11963cond-mat.mes-hallcs.ET
收藏

忆阻器测试的实验演示

An experimental demonstration of the memristor test

Y. V. Pershin, J. Kim, T. Datta, M. Di Ventra

AI总结:

本文通过实验应用理想忆阻器判别测试,检验被称为“$Φ$ 忆阻器”的载流导线-磁芯系统,证明其实为具有记忆的电感器而非忆阻器。

摘要:

最近有人提出了一种简单而明确的测试方法[J. Phys. D: Applied Physics, 52, 01LT01 (2018)],用于通过实验检验一个具有记忆的电阻器是否确实是忆阻器,即其电阻仅取决于流过它的电荷,或取决于其两端电压的历史。然而,尽管这种测试可作为关于忆阻器(理想意义上)主张的试金石,但它尚未被广泛应用于实际物理器件。在本文中,我们将该测试实验性地应用于一根与磁芯相互作用的载流导线,该器件最近被声称是一种忆阻器(所谓的“$Φ$ 忆阻器”)[J. Appl. Phys. 125, 054504 (2019)]。我们的实验结果明确表明,这种“$Φ$ 忆阻器”并不是忆阻器:它只是一个具有记忆的电感器。这一演示进一步令人怀疑理想忆阻器是否真的存在于自然界中,或是否能在实验室中被轻易制造出来。

英文摘要:

A simple and unambiguous test has been recently suggested [J. Phys. D: Applied Physics, 52, 01LT01 (2018)] to check experimentally if a resistor with memory is indeed a memristor, namely a resistor whose resistance depends only on the charge that flows through it, or on the history of the voltage across it. However, although such a test would represent the litmus test for claims about memristors (in the ideal sense), it has yet to be applied widely to actual physical devices. In this paper, we experimentally apply it to a current-carrying wire interacting with a magnetic core, which was recently claimed to be a memristor (so-called `$Φ$ memristor') [J. Appl. Phys. 125, 054504 (2019)]. The results of our experiment demonstrate unambiguously that this `$Φ$ memristor' is not a memristor: it is simply an inductor with memory. This demonstration casts further doubts that ideal memristors do actually exist in nature or may be easily created in the lab.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑