arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.11032cs.CL
收藏

不同票据类型的自动去识别性能

Performance of Automatic De-identification Across Different Note Types

University of Washington(华盛顿大学);George Mason University(乔治梅森大学)

Nicholas Dobbins, David Wayne, Kahyun Lee, Özlem Uzuner, Meliha Yetisgen

摘要:

自由文本临床笔记详细说明了患者护理的各个方面,并且具有促进质量改进和保证举措以及推进临床研究的巨大潜力。然而,对患者隐私和保密性的担忧限制了临床笔记用于研究。因此,大多数研究人员仍然无法获得这些笔记中记录的信息。去识别(de-id),即,定位和删除个人识别受保护的健康信息(PHI)是改善对临床叙述的访问的一种方式。然而,有有限的现成的去识别系统能够在不同的数据源和医疗专业一致地检测PHI。在这篇摘要中,我们展示了一个名为NeuroNER 1的最先进的de-id系统在华盛顿大学(UW)的一组不同笔记上的性能,当模型是在来自外部机构(Partners Healthcare)与来自同一机构(UW)的数据上训练时。我们目前的结果在PHI和注意类型的水平。

英文摘要:

Free-text clinical notes detail all aspects of patient care and have great potential to facilitate quality improvement and assurance initiatives as well as advance clinical research. However, concerns about patient privacy and confidentiality limit the use of clinical notes for research. As a result, the information documented in these notes remains unavailable for most researchers. De-identification (de-id), i.e., locating and removing personally identifying protected health information (PHI), is one way of improving access to clinical narratives. However, there are limited off-the-shelf de-identification systems able to consistently detect PHI across different data sources and medical specialties. In this abstract, we present the performance of a state-of-the art de-id system called NeuroNER1 on a diverse set of notes from University of Washington (UW) when the models are trained on data from an external institution (Partners Healthcare) vs. from the same institution (UW). We present results at the level of PHI and note types.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑