arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2104.04402cs.CL

A preliminary study on evaluating Consultation Notes with Post-Editing

Babylon Health(巴比伦健康公司);University of Aberdeen(阿伯丁大学)

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Aleksandar Savkov, Ehud Reiter

英文摘要:

Automatic summarisation has the potential to aid physicians in streamlining clerical tasks such as note taking. But it is notoriously difficult to evaluate these systems and demonstrate that they are safe to be used in a clinical setting. To circumvent this issue, we propose a semi-automatic approach whereby physicians post-edit generated notes before submitting them. We conduct a preliminary study on the time saving of automatically generated consultation notes with post-editing. Our evaluators are asked to listen to mock consultations and to post-edit three generated notes. We time this and find that it is faster than writing the note from scratch. We present insights and lessons learnt from this experiment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑