arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2102.07460hep-lathep-phnucl-th
收藏

从格点量子色动力学计算核子的等矢电磁形状因子和质子半径之谜

Isovector electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from lattice QCD and the proton radius puzzle

D. Djukanovic, T. Harris, G. von Hippel, P. M. Junnarkar, H. B. Meyer, D. Mohler, K. Ottnad, T. Schulz, J. Wilhelm, H. Wittig

摘要:

本文给出了用$\mathcal{O}(a)$-改进的Wilson费米子和$\mathcal{O}(a)$ -改进的矢量流的$N_f=2+1$方法在CLS系综上计算的核子等矢量电磁形状因子的结果。分析包括合奏与四个晶格间距和π介子质量范围从130 MeV到350 MeV,主要针对低$Q^2$区域。为了消除任何偏见,从未抑制的激发态的贡献,我们调查了几个源-汇分离1.0 FM和1.5 FM之间,并应用求和方法以及明确的两个状态的配合。手征插值是通过应用协变手征微扰理论,包括矢量介子直接到我们的形状因子数据,从而避免了辅助参数化的$Q^2$依赖。在物理点上,我们得到了核子等矢量磁矩的$μ=4.71(11)_{\mathrm{stat}}(13)_{\mathrm{sys}}$,与实验值很好地一致,得到了相应平方半径的$\langle r_\mathrm{M}^2\rangle~=~0.661(30)_{\mathrm{stat}}(11)_{\mathrm{sys}}\,~\mathrm{fm}^2$,与从$ep$散射测定中推断的值也很好地一致[Bernauer等人,物理学评论快报,105,242001(2010)]的质子半径。然而,我们对等矢量电荷半径$\langle r_\mathrm{E}^2\rangle = 0.800(25)_{\mathrm{stat}}(22)_{\mathrm{sys}}\,~\mathrm{fm}^2$的估计与从上述$ep$散射数据推断的较大值略有矛盾,同时与从2018年CODATA质子电荷半径平均值得出的值一致。

英文摘要:

We present results for the isovector electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon computed on the CLS ensembles with $N_f=2+1$ flavors of $\mathcal{O}(a)$-improved Wilson fermions and an $\mathcal{O}(a)$-improved vector current. The analysis includes ensembles with four lattice spacings and pion masses ranging from 130 MeV up to 350 MeV and mainly targets the low-$Q^2$ region. In order to remove any bias from unsuppressed excited-state contributions, we investigate several source-sink separations between 1.0 fm and 1.5 fm and apply the summation method as well as explicit two-state fits. The chiral interpolation is performed by applying covariant chiral perturbation theory including vector mesons directly to our form factor data, thus avoiding an auxiliary parametrization of the $Q^2$ dependence. At the physical point, we obtain $μ=4.71(11)_{\mathrm{stat}}(13)_{\mathrm{sys}}$ for the nucleon isovector magnetic moment, in good agreement with the experimental value and $\langle r_\mathrm{M}^2\rangle~=~0.661(30)_{\mathrm{stat}}(11)_{\mathrm{sys}}\,~\mathrm{fm}^2$ for the corresponding square-radius, again in good agreement with the value inferred from the $ep$-scattering determination [Bernauer et~al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 242001 (2010)] of the proton radius. Our estimate for the isovector electric charge radius, $\langle r_\mathrm{E}^2\rangle = 0.800(25)_{\mathrm{stat}}(22)_{\mathrm{sys}}\,~\mathrm{fm}^2$, however, is in slight tension with the larger value inferred from the aforementioned $ep$-scattering data, while being in agreement with the value derived from the 2018 CODATA average for the proton charge radius.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑