arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.04508cond-mat.str-el
收藏

自洽多体微扰论的物理与非物理区域

Physical and unphysical regimes of self-consistent many-body perturbation theory

K. Van Houcke, E. Kozik, R. Rossi, Y. Deng, F. Werner

AI总结:

研究自洽多体微扰论中截断自能级数的收敛性,证明弱耦合下收敛至精确传播子而强耦合下偏离,并提出无需精确解即可区分物理与非物理区域的判据。

摘要:

在自洽多体微扰论的标准框架中,自能的骨架级数被截断至有限阶$\mathcal{N}$,并代入戴森方程,随后求解传播子$G_{\mathcal{N}}\\,$。我们考虑两个费米子模型实例:半填充的哈伯德原子及其零时空维简化版本。首先,我们证明当$\mathcal{N}\to\infty$时,$G_{\mathcal{N}}\\,$收敛至极限$G_\infty\\,$,在耦合足够弱时,该极限与精确物理传播子$G_{\rm exact}\\ $一致,而在强耦合时$G_\infty \neq G_{\rm exact}\\ $。这源于[Kozik, Ferrero and Georges, PRL 114, 156402 (2015)]的发现以及此处阐明的一个微妙数学机制。其次,我们证明,借助一个无需知道$G_{\rm exact}\\ $的判据,可以区分$G_\infty=G_{\rm exact}\\ $与$G_\infty\neq G_{\rm exact}\\ $两种区域,如[Rossi et al., PRB 93, 161102(R) (2016)]所提议。

英文摘要:

In the standard framework of self-consistent many-body perturbation theory, the skeleton series for the self-energy is truncated at a finite order $\mathcal{N}$ and plugged into the Dyson equation, which is then solved for the propagator $G_{\mathcal{N}}\,$. We consider two examples of fermionic models, the Hubbard atom at half filling and its zero space-time dimensional simplified version. First, we show that $G_{\mathcal{N}}\,$ converges when $\mathcal{N}\to\infty$ to a limit $G_\infty\,$, which coincides with the exact physical propagator $G_{\rm exact}\ $ at small enough coupling, while $G_\infty \neq G_{\rm exact}\ $ at strong coupling. This follows from the findings of [Kozik, Ferrero and Georges, PRL 114, 156402 (2015)] and an additional subtle mathematical mechanism elucidated here. Second, we demonstrate that it is possible to discriminate between the $G_\infty=G_{\rm exact}\ $ and $G_\infty\neq G_{\rm exact}\ $ regimes thanks to a criterion which does not require the knowledge of $G_{\rm exact}\ $, as proposed in [Rossi et al., PRB 93, 161102(R) (2016)].

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑