arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2101.11501cs.AIcs.PL
收藏

人工智能语言的演变:一个系统的文献综述

Evolution of artificial intelligence languages, a systematic literature review

Covenant University(圣约大学);Durban University of Technology(德班理工大学)

Emmanuel Adetiba, Temitope John, Adekunle Akinrinmade, Funmilayo Moninuola, Oladipupo Akintade, Joke Badejo

摘要:

人工智能(AI)领域近年来无疑受到了极大的关注。人工智能正被用于为医学、工程、教育、政府和其他几个领域的问题提供解决方案。为了分析人工智能领域的研究现状,我们对人工智能程序设计语言的发展进行了系统的文献综述。我们遵循系统文献综述方法,检索相关数据库,如SCOPUS、IEEE Xplore和Google Scholar。EndNote参考文献管理器用于对相关提取论文进行编目。我们的检索共返回了6565份文件,其中69项研究被保留。在保留的69项研究中,15份文件讨论了LISP编程语言,另外34份讨论了PROTECH编程语言,其余20份文件分布在逻辑和面向对象编程(LOOP)、ARCHESTIC、带有约束的认知本体语言(EOLC)、Python、C++、ADA和JAVA程序设计语言之间。本综述提供了有关所讨论的每种AI程序设计语言的实施年份、开发团队、功能、限制和应用的信息。本文中的信息可以指导人工智能领域的从业者和研究人员正确选择语言来实现他们的新人工智能方法。

英文摘要:

The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has undoubtedly received significant attention in recent years. AI is being adopted to provide solutions to problems in fields such as medicine, engineering, education, government and several other domains. In order to analyze the state of the art of research in the field of AI, we present a systematic literature review focusing on the Evolution of AI programming languages. We followed the systematic literature review method by searching relevant databases like SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore and Google Scholar. EndNote reference manager was used to catalog the relevant extracted papers. Our search returned a total of 6565 documents, whereof 69 studies were retained. Of the 69 retained studies, 15 documents discussed LISP programming language, another 34 discussed PROLOG programming language, the remaining 20 documents were spread between Logic and Object Oriented Programming (LOOP), ARCHLOG, Epistemic Ontology Language with Constraints (EOLC), Python, C++, ADA and JAVA programming languages. This review provides information on the year of implementation, development team, capabilities, limitations and applications of each of the AI programming languages discussed. The information in this review could guide practitioners and researchers in AI to make the right choice of languages to implement their novel AI methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑