arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2101.06211stat.MEstat.AP
收藏

重新审视多项 logit 与混合多项 logit 模型中备选方案抽样的 McFadden 校正因子

Revisiting McFadden's correction factor for sampling of alternatives in multinomial logit and mixed multinomial logit models

Thijs Dekker, Prateek Bansal, Jinghai Huo

AI总结:

本文重新分析 MNL 与 MMNL 中备选方案抽样的 McFadden 校正因子,将其推广至正条件化与贝叶斯框架,证明该因子可最小化感兴趣参数的期望信息损失,并通过 Monte Carlo 模拟验证。

摘要:

本文重新审视 McFadden(1978)针对多项 logit(MNL)和混合多项 logit(MMNL)模型中备选方案抽样提出的校正因子。McFadden(1978)证明,在使用包含所选备选方案的抽样子集来估计 MNL 模型并结合该校正因子时,可以得到一致的参数估计。我们将该校正因子分解为两部分:i)对因使用较小备选方案子集而高估 MNL 选择概率的校正;ii)对备选方案子集通过效用差异进行比较所产生的校正,即由此在多大程度上能够了解 MNL 中感兴趣参数。Keane 和 Wasi(2016)证明,当采用满足均匀条件化的抽样协议时,真实似然与抽样似然之间由上述两个要素构成的总体期望正信息散度达到最小。我们将其结果推广到正条件化情形,并表明尽管 McFadden(1978)的校正因子可能不会使总体期望信息散度最小化,但它确实使关于感兴趣参数的期望信息损失最小化。我们将该结果应用于贝叶斯分析,并表明无论样本量大小,McFadden(1978)的校正因子都能在整个后验密度上使关于感兴趣参数的期望信息损失最小化。换言之,McFadden(1978)的校正因子具有理想的小样本和大样本性质。我们还表明,针对贝叶斯 MNL 模型得到的结果可迁移至 MMNL,并且仅需 McFadden(1978)校正因子,就足以使感兴趣参数的期望信息损失最小化。Monte Carlo 模拟说明了备选方案抽样在贝叶斯 MMNL 模型中的成功应用。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we revisit McFadden (1978)'s correction factor for sampling of alternatives in multinomial logit (MNL) and mixed multinomial logit (MMNL) models. McFadden (1978) proved that consistent parameter estimates are obtained when estimating MNL models using a sampled subset of alternatives, including the chosen alternative, in combination with a correction factor. We decompose this correction factor into i) a correction for overestimating the MNL choice probability due to using a smaller subset of alternatives, and ii) a correction for which a subset of alternatives is contrasted through utility differences and thereby the extent to which we learn about the parameters of interest in MNL. Keane and Wasi (2016) proved that the overall expected positive information divergence - comprising the above two elements - is minimised between the true and sampled likelihood when applying a sampling protocol satisfying uniform conditioning. We generalise their result to the case of positive conditioning and show that whilst McFadden (1978)'s correction factor may not minimise the overall expected information divergence, it does minimise the expected information loss with respect to the parameters of interest. We apply this result in the context of Bayesian analysis and show that McFadden (1978)'s correction factor minimises the expected information loss regarding the parameters of interest across the entire posterior density irrespective of sample size. In other words, McFadden (1978)'s correction factor has desirable small and large sample properties. We also show that our results for Bayesian MNL models transfer to MMNL and that only McFadden (1978) correction factor is sufficient to minimise the expected information loss in the parameters of interest. Monte Carlo simulations illustrate the successful application of sampling of alternatives in Bayesian MMNL models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑