arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2012.15616cs.AIcs.LG
收藏

Quantitative Evaluations on Saliency Methods: An Experimental Study

Huawei Technologies(华为技术有限公司);Hong Kong University of Science and Technology(香港科技大学)

Xiao-Hui Li, Yuhan Shi, Haoyang Li, Wei Bai, Yuanwei Song, Caleb Chen Cao, Lei Chen

英文摘要:

It has been long debated that eXplainable AI (XAI) is an important topic, but it lacks rigorous definition and fair metrics. In this paper, we briefly summarize the status quo of the metrics, along with an exhaustive experimental study based on them, including faithfulness, localization, false-positives, sensitivity check, and stability. With the experimental results, we conclude that among all the methods we compare, no single explanation method dominates others in all metrics. Nonetheless, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and Randomly Input Sampling for Explanation (RISE) perform fairly well in most of the metrics. Utilizing a set of filtered metrics, we further present a case study to diagnose the classification bases for models. While providing a comprehensive experimental study of metrics, we also examine measuring factors that are missed in current metrics and hope this valuable work could serve as a guide for future research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑