arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2012.09462hep-phastro-ph.CO
收藏

暗物质研究工具综述

Review on Dark Matter Tools

Chiara Arina

摘要:

虽然对暗物质的需求在近一个世纪前就被确立了,但到目前为止,只有它的引力相互作用得到了证实,这使得暗物质的模型过多。弱相互作用大质量粒子(WIMPs)类别迄今为止受到了最大的关注,然而,尽管有巨大的实验努力,这些粒子仍然难以捉摸。因此,社会的注意力转移到调查的暗物质景观在一个更大的模型与不同程度的相似性和差异,在他们的预测。这就需要组织暗物质模型及其特征的各个方面,以最大限度地提高实验灵敏度,并选择与现有数据兼容的模型。在本文中,我提供了一个简短的审查最广泛的公共代码能够计算暗物质观测。特别是,我讨论了什么是每个数值工具的状态:(一)捕捉的WIMP现象和(二)占新的趋势暗扇区模型,可能是弱耦合到普通物质和/或强烈的自我相互作用。这个简短的评论的目的是指导用户选择最适合的公共代码,以面对他/她的模型与各种各样的理论预测和实验数据,以确定参数空间与他/她最喜欢的暗物质模型的观察一致。

英文摘要:

Whilst the need for dark matter was established almost a century ago, only its gravitational interaction has been confirmed so far, allowing for plethora of models for dark matter. The Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) category has received by far the biggest attention, however despite the enormous experimental efforts, these particles remain elusive. The attention of the community has hence moved on to investigate the dark matter landscape over a much larger number of models with varying degrees of resemblances and differences in their predictions. This calls for the need to organise the various facets of dark matter models and their signatures, in order to maximise the experimental sensitivity and to select the models which are compatible with existing data. In this paper, I provide a short review of the most widespread public codes capable of computing dark matter observables. In particular, I discuss what is the status of each numerical tool in terms of: (i) capturing the WIMP phenomenology and (ii) accounting for new trend dark sector models that might be weakly coupled to ordinary matter and/or be strongly self-interacting. This short review has the aim of guiding the user towards selecting the best suited public code to confront his/her model with the largest variety of theoretical predictions and experimental data in order to determine the parameter space consistent with observations for his/her favourite dark matter model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑