arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.03812cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

改进选择问题中的公平性和隐私性

Improving Fairness and Privacy in Selection Problems

University of Delaware(特拉华大学);University of Michigan(密歇根大学);Alan Turing Institute(阿兰·图灵研究所);University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校)

Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed Abroshan, Somayeh Sojoudi

摘要:

监督学习模型已经越来越多地用于在招聘、贷款和大学录取等应用中对个人做出决策。这些模型可能会从训练数据集继承预先存在的偏差,并歧视受保护的属性(例如,种族或性别)。除了不公平之外,当模型的使用暴露了敏感的个人信息时,隐私问题也会出现。在各种隐私概念中,差分隐私是近年来比较流行的一种隐私概念。在这项工作中,我们研究了使用差分私有指数机制作为后处理步骤来提高监督学习模型的公平性和隐私性的可能性。与许多现有的作品不同,我们考虑的情况下,监督模型用于选择有限数量的申请人的可用职位的数量是有限的。这个假设非常适合各种场景,例如工作申请和大学录取。我们使用“机会均等”作为公平的概念,并表明指数机制可以使决策过程完全公平。此外,在真实世界数据集上的实验表明,指数机制可以提高隐私和公平性,与没有后处理的模型相比,准确性略有下降。

英文摘要:

Supervised learning models have been increasingly used for making decisions about individuals in applications such as hiring, lending, and college admission. These models may inherit pre-existing biases from training datasets and discriminate against protected attributes (e.g., race or gender). In addition to unfairness, privacy concerns also arise when the use of models reveals sensitive personal information. Among various privacy notions, differential privacy has become popular in recent years. In this work, we study the possibility of using a differentially private exponential mechanism as a post-processing step to improve both fairness and privacy of supervised learning models. Unlike many existing works, we consider a scenario where a supervised model is used to select a limited number of applicants as the number of available positions is limited. This assumption is well-suited for various scenarios, such as job application and college admission. We use ``equal opportunity'' as the fairness notion and show that the exponential mechanisms can make the decision-making process perfectly fair. Moreover, the experiments on real-world datasets show that the exponential mechanism can improve both privacy and fairness, with a slight decrease in accuracy compared to the model without post-processing.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑