arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.01668stat.MLcs.LG
收藏

线性回归模型的在线遗忘过程

Online Forgetting Process for Linear Regression Models

Purdue University(普渡大学)

Yuantong Li, Chi-hua Wang, Guang Cheng

AI总结:

针对欧盟“被遗忘权”法规下的数据删除问题,本文提出在线遗忘算法FIFD-OLS与FIFD-Adaptive Ridge,后者通过在线正则化有效抵消删除不确定性,并在理论上给出遗憾上界,实验证明其优于固定正则化的岭回归。

摘要:

受欧盟“被遗忘权”法规的启发,我们启动了对统计数据删除问题的研究,在该问题中,用户的数据仅在一段有限的时间内可访问。该设置被表述为一个具有恒定内存限制的在线监督学习任务。我们针对低维情况提出了一种删除感知算法FIFD-OLS,并观察到由于数据删除操作导致的灾难性秩摆动现象,这导致了统计效率低下。作为补救措施,我们提出了一种具有新颖在线正则化方案的FIFD-Adaptive Ridge算法,该算法有效抵消了删除带来的不确定性。在理论上,我们为这两种在线遗忘算法提供了累积遗憾上界。在实验中,我们展示了FIFD-Adaptive Ridge优于具有固定正则化水平的岭回归算法,并希望为更复杂的统计模型提供一些启示。

英文摘要:

Motivated by the EU's "Right To Be Forgotten" regulation, we initiate a study of statistical data deletion problems where users' data are accessible only for a limited period of time. This setting is formulated as an online supervised learning task with \textit{constant memory limit}. We propose a deletion-aware algorithm \texttt{FIFD-OLS} for the low dimensional case, and witness a catastrophic rank swinging phenomenon due to the data deletion operation, which leads to statistical inefficiency. As a remedy, we propose the \texttt{FIFD-Adaptive Ridge} algorithm with a novel online regularization scheme, that effectively offsets the uncertainty from deletion. In theory, we provide the cumulative regret upper bound for both online forgetting algorithms. In the experiment, we showed \texttt{FIFD-Adaptive Ridge} outperforms the ridge regression algorithm with fixed regularization level, and hopefully sheds some light on more complex statistical models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑