arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2011.14860cs.DB
收藏

无限概率数据库

Infinite Probabilistic Databases

Martin Grohe, Peter Lindner

AI总结:

本文提出用有限点过程构建无限概率数据库的模型,解决不可数空间下查询语义的定义问题,并证明了关系代数、聚合及 Datalog 查询的可测性。

摘要:

概率数据库(PDBs)以定量的方式对数据中的不确定性进行建模。在既定的形式化框架中,概率(关系)数据库是关系数据库实例上的有限概率空间。这种有限性可能与直观的查询行为(Ceylan 等人,KR 2016)以及更适合用连续概率分布建模的应用场景(Dalvi 等人,CACM 2009)产生冲突。我们在(Grohe 和 Lindner,PODS 2019)中正式引入了无限概率数据库(infinite PDBs),主要关注可数无限空间。然而,扩展到不可数概率空间会引发涉及事件和查询可测性的非平凡基础性问题,并最终关系到查询是否具有明确定义的语义。我们认为有限点过程(finite point processes)是概率论中处理一般概率数据库的合适模型。这使我们能够以系统的方式构造合适的(不可数)数据库实例概率空间。我们的主要技术结果是关于关系代数查询以及聚合查询和 Datalog 查询的可测性陈述。

英文摘要:

Probabilistic databases (PDBs) model uncertainty in data in a quantitative way. In the established formal framework, probabilistic (relational) databases are finite probability spaces over relational database instances. This finiteness can clash with intuitive query behavior (Ceylan et al., KR 2016), and with application scenarios that are better modeled by continuous probability distributions (Dalvi et al., CACM 2009). We formally introduced infinite PDBs in (Grohe and Lindner, PODS 2019) with a primary focus on countably infinite spaces. However, an extension beyond countable probability spaces raises nontrivial foundational issues concerned with the measurability of events and queries and ultimately with the question whether queries have a well-defined semantics. We argue that finite point processes are an appropriate model from probability theory for dealing with general probabilistic databases. This allows us to construct suitable (uncountable) probability spaces of database instances in a systematic way. Our main technical results are measurability statements for relational algebra queries as well as aggregate queries and Datalog queries.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑