arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2011.11150cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

连续约束优化结构学习的收敛性

On the Convergence of Continuous Constrained Optimization for Structure Learning

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);Mila, Université de Montréal(蒙特利尔大学米拉研究所);DeepMind(深度思维);Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence(穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学)

Ignavier Ng, Sébastien Lachapelle, Nan Rosemary Ke, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Kun Zhang

摘要:

最近,结构学习的有向无环图(DAG)已被制定为一个连续的优化问题,利用代数特征的无环性。约束问题的求解使用增广拉格朗日方法(ALM),这往往是首选的二次罚方法(QPM)凭借其标准的收敛结果,不需要罚系数去无穷大,从而避免病态。然而,这些结构学习方法的收敛特性,包括它们是否保证返回DAG解,仍然不清楚,这可能会限制它们的实际应用。在这项工作中,我们研究了在线性,非线性和混杂的情况下,ALM和QPM结构学习的收敛性。我们表明,标准的收敛结果的ALM不持有在这些设置,并证明经验,其行为是类似的QPM这是容易生病。我们进一步建立了收敛保证QPM的DAG解决方案,在温和的条件下。最后,我们将我们的理论结果与现有的方法,以帮助解决收敛问题,并验证我们的研究结果,根据他们的实证比较。

英文摘要:

Recently, structure learning of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) has been formulated as a continuous optimization problem by leveraging an algebraic characterization of acyclicity. The constrained problem is solved using the augmented Lagrangian method (ALM) which is often preferred to the quadratic penalty method (QPM) by virtue of its standard convergence result that does not require the penalty coefficient to go to infinity, hence avoiding ill-conditioning. However, the convergence properties of these methods for structure learning, including whether they are guaranteed to return a DAG solution, remain unclear, which might limit their practical applications. In this work, we examine the convergence of ALM and QPM for structure learning in the linear, nonlinear, and confounded cases. We show that the standard convergence result of ALM does not hold in these settings, and demonstrate empirically that its behavior is akin to that of the QPM which is prone to ill-conditioning. We further establish the convergence guarantee of QPM to a DAG solution, under mild conditions. Lastly, we connect our theoretical results with existing approaches to help resolve the convergence issue, and verify our findings in light of an empirical comparison of them.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑